LOS ANGELES—As local governments face increasing budget pressure, and as tools such as tax increment financing face increasing political hostility, real estate developers should remember that there are many opportunities for private developers to partner with public agencies to finance and build projects. There is certainly a great need for help in rebuilding and upgrading infrastructure and utilities, and the lack of available state and municipal funding for public improvement projects will mean great opportunities for developers through public private partnerships.

One of the most common approaches to public private partnerships is based on tax incentives, such as property or sales tax reimbursement agreements, tax increment financing, payments in lieu of taxes, and tax credit financing, among others. Under such arrangements, the developer can be reimbursed for all or a portion of its development costs from the new taxes generated by the completed project or can enjoy tax abatements or tax credits (e.g., energy tax credits) for the project.

Other approaches rely on the issuance of bonds and/or the levying of assessments by special authorities or districts formed in connection with a project, taking advantage of the exemption from income taxes on interest paid on those bonds. Typically, the local government can form either an existing or a newly formed industrial development authority, transportation development district, or community improvement district, which issues bonds paying low—but tax-exempt—interest, the proceeds of which partially fund the project. The developer gets cheap, long-term financing, and the local government gets a needed improvement.

Public private partnerships invariably present some interesting challenges. The local government's ability to use these financing structures, and the available tools, will be governed by state and local legislation that varies quite a bit from state to state. The public partner in these deals will often have both economic goals and political or social goals that are not normally encountered in real estate development, but which do need to be accommodated. Developers may need to follow rules to which they are not accustomed, such as federal, state or local public bidding rules, public notice/comment and other requirements intended to facilitate transparency in the process, prevailing wage regulations and other labor-related mandates, and will need to assess the impact of profit sharing limitations and other exactions that might affect the economics of a project, all of which will certainly make for a more complex transaction.

The key for a developer is identifying and engaging with the relevant public agency early in the discussions of the proposed project, giving the developer the chance to let the relevant public decision makers know of the benefits of the developer's expertise and the advantages of public private partnerships.

Grace Winters is an associate, and Tom Muller is a partner in the real estate and land use practice at Manatt, Phelps & Phillips LLP. The views expressed in this column are the author's own.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Once you are an ALM Digital Member, you’ll receive:

  • Breaking commercial real estate news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
  • Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
  • Critical coverage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.