Depending if you are in the higher end residential business or purely commercial real estate, the tax bill is good or maybe bad. While there is more negotiation to do, especially on SALT, the basic deal seems to be done, subject to the super egos of the Republican senators like Collins, McCain and Corker who could ruin the whole thing again just as they did with Obamacare. Hopefully McCain got beaten up enough by his constituents over his antics on Obamacare, that he will not grandstand on the tax bill.

Collins is the other one who needs to understand that she alone does not get to decide what the bill says and she will vote yes even when it is not to her liking. Flake will probably vote yes despite his hate for Trump, and Corker then does not matter. Bottom line it will pass because all Republicans understand they are obliterated as a political party if they fail to pass tax reform. This is not Obamacare which impacted a relatively small number of voters. Taxes hits 100% of voters and cutting taxes is what gets you elected.

It seems from the first cursory read that real estate was spared a lot of the pain of some other eliminations of deductions, except if you are in the high-end residential business. For people like me who have residence in New York, and more than one high-end home where both income and property taxes are high, and where I have part of my business in a personal service business, the tax bill is a terrible hit. The $10,000 limit to property taxes is a very big hit to me, and the elimination of SALT is even worse.

A quick calculation suggests my SALT deductions are reduced by 87%. Elimination of AMT helps but as a New York resident with luxury homes in Manhattan and the Hamptons, I have a lot of incentive to make my residence at my Florida home. I believe I am fairly typical of many others in New York metro and the same will apply to California, NJ, and a few other Democratic run states with very high taxes. The outcome can only be that there will be a decline in values for upper income residential in all of these states and cities.

Otherwise the tax bill seems to favor real estate by retaining some of the good things we depend on. It appears real estate is not covered by the interest deduction limitation, 1031 exchanges are retained but there are some possible changes and carried interest is retained, as are low income housing credits. New market tax credits and other tax credits seem to be eliminated.

The bill is very complex and will have some changes so you need to sit with your tax experts and see how it applies to your business and product. It will be very different for those developing and owning commercial as opposed to residential in high SALT locations.

Overall, ignoring the real estate specific points, the tax bill will be very good for the economy and will very likely raise growth to over 3% and maybe as high as 3.5% since the world economy is stronger and growing nicely and will provide the strong growth bias in any event. The tax bill just adds fuel to a good thrust we are now on. T

he elimination of many problematic regulations that impacted development and buildings in general is a very good thing, and the combination of deregulation and lower corporate taxes, along with potential massive repatriation, and infrastructure spending, portends a very good run for CRE for several more years. As corporations add to earnings, they can afford to add to their real estate, and will likely do so, especially in the distribution and industrial areas.

With the lower corporate rates and incentives to keep operations in the US, the potential for growth in the industrial and warehouse distribution sector is very high. It will be the place to be for many years. With the tax bill as set forth, Trump does not need to impose tariffs and does not need to blow up NAFTA to bring factories and jobs back to the US. The tax bill and deregulation do that in a major way.

Overall, the tax bill initially appears to be a big win for CRE other than for residential in certain Democratically run states. I expect the property tax deduction will get raised a few thousand dollars, but that will not really make any material difference to the developers of high end homes and condos. Like everything in life, one man's problem is another man's opportunity. So the problems for New York, NJ, and CA residential developers, is a grand good news thing for Florida, Nevada and Texas developers. Maybe to compete the Democrats will finally see the error of their ways on taxes and regulations, and excessive development fees in local communities, and will start to lower those costs to compete. I doubt it, but maybe.

If the Republicans in the Senate do not act like egomaniac idiots again, and if the bill passes in its essentially current form, then the economy will continue to grow well, the stock markets will continue to go up and, with the corruption investigations into Hilary and the DNC and the dossier in full gear next year, Republicans will not only keep control, but will pick up seats in the Senate and local legislatures and governorships, and we will see more deregulation and pro developer attitudes. It is the economy stupid.

Voters will see that they have secure jobs, wages will start rising, and taxes reducing, their 401K is increasing in value, as is the value of their home, and that is all that it takes to get votes. Trump will be vindicated on the Russia garbage and it will have been shown to all be the result of the dossier Hilary paid Russians to create, and it will be the Democrats who are in deep trouble and not the Republicans. If this plays out that way, Trump will get reelected despite what we all may think of him the person and his tweets. It is the policy, and money in the pockets of voters that matters.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Once you are an ALM Digital Member, you’ll receive:

  • Breaking commercial real estate news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
  • Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
  • Critical coverage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Joel Ross

Joel Ross began his career in Wall St as an investment banker in 1965, handling corporate advisory matters for a variety of clients. During the seventies he was CEO of North American operations for a UK based conglomerate, and sat on the parent company board. In 1981, he began his own firm handling leveraged buyouts, investment banking and real estate financing. In 1984 Ross began providing investment banking services and arranging financing for real estate transactions with his own firm, Ross Properties, Inc. In 1993 Ross and a partner, Lexington Mortgage, created the first Wall St hotel CMBS program in conjunction with Nomura. They went on to develop a similar CMBS program for another major Wall St investment bank and for five leading hotel companies. Lexington, in partnership with Mr. Ross established a hotel mortgage bank table funded by an investment bank, and making all CMBS hotel loans on their behalf. In 1999 he formed Citadel Realty Advisors as a successor to Ross Properties Corp., focusing on real estate investment banking in the US, UK and Paris. He has closed over $3.0 billion of financings for office, hotel, retail, land and multifamily projects. Ross is also a founder of Market Street Investors, a brownfield land development company, and has been involved in the acquisition of notes on defaulted loans and various REO assets in conjunction with several major investors. Ross was an adjunct professor in the graduate program at the NYU Hotel School. He is a member of Urban Land Institute and was a member of the leadership of his ULI council. In 1999, he conceived and co-authored with PricewaterhouseCoopers, the Hotel Mortgage Performance Report, a major study of hotel mortgage default rates.