California's legislature previously passed an update to Civil Code Section 1938 which, effective as of July 1, 2013, required all commercial property leases to disclose whether or not a commercial premises has undergone an inspection by a Certified Access Specialist (CASp), and if so, whether the premises has been determined to meet all applicable construction-related accessibility standards under California law. In the exclusive commentary below, Payvand Abghari, an associate in the real estate and land use practice group at Manatt, Phelps & Phillips LLP, along with Michael C. Polentz, co-chair of the group, say that “owners and lessors of commercial properties are advised to take steps now.”
The views expressed in the commentary below are the author's own.
Following the amendment to Section 1938, compliance with the amendment was achieved by plugging boilerplate disclosure language into leasing agreements. Notwithstanding such practices, the anecdotal experience seemingly suggested that further steps needed to be taken to bolster the amount of information prospective tenants of commercial properties are provided concerning a premises' compliance or non-compliance, as the case may be, with such standards.
Recommended For You
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.
Once you are an ALM Digital Member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking commercial real estate news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical coverage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
*May exclude premium content© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.