The proposal, which will appear on the November ballot, is known as Measure N. Its slow-growth supporters had gone to court before the ballot arguments could be printed, asking a judge to change some of the wording of the No-on-N group's argument.
The original statement suggested that Measure N would replace a "consensus Hillside Protection Plan." Supporters of Measure N argued that there's nothing called a "Hillside Protection Plan," only a "Hillside Management Plan." They also argued that Measure N doesn't replace anything.
A Superior Court judge agreed with Measure N supporters and ordered the ballot statements changed. Those who oppose Measure N, including some real estate interests, say they didn't mean to mislead anyone.
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.
Once you are an ALM Digital Member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking commercial real estate news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical coverage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
*May exclude premium content© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
