The proposal, which will appear on the November ballot, is known as Measure N. Its slow-growth supporters had gone to court before the ballot arguments could be printed, asking a judge to change some of the wording of the No-on-N group's argument.

The original statement suggested that Measure N would replace a "consensus Hillside Protection Plan." Supporters of Measure N argued that there's nothing called a "Hillside Protection Plan," only a "Hillside Management Plan." They also argued that Measure N doesn't replace anything.

A Superior Court judge agreed with Measure N supporters and ordered the ballot statements changed. Those who oppose Measure N, including some real estate interests, say they didn't mean to mislead anyone.

Continue Reading for Free

Register and gain access to:

  • Breaking commercial real estate news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
  • Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
  • Critical coverage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.