Ninety cities across California joined LA in asking the state Supreme Court to uphold the unusual fee plan, which earlier had been tossed out by two lower courts. The state Supreme Court's reversal now becomes case law and can be cited in similar cases across the country.

"The fact that almost 100 cities backed LA in this suit tells you that owners are going to find themselves facing even more fees in the months ahead," an attorney who has represented several apartment investors over the years tells GlobeSt.com.

The case (Apartment Assn. of Los Angeles vs. City of Los Angeles) began in 1998, after LA's City Council approved a $1-a-month charge on each unit in a building to help fund the cost of paying for more inspectors. Under the program, the owner of a 75-unit apartment complex would pay $75 a month, or $900 annually, to offset the local government's cost of hiring enough staffers to ensure that every rental in the city is inspected at least once every three years.

Continue Reading for Free

Register and gain access to:

  • Breaking commercial real estate news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
  • Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
  • Critical coverage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.