Senior executives from both firms did not return phone calls seeking comment, but sources say there were apparently too many internal hurdles to overcome. CB Richard Ellis' $750 privatization plan, which would have brought expansion possibilities for both companies, was not cited as a cause.

"On paper it looks like a deal that would help both of them," says one South Bay insider. "CB would get into the Peninsula and Silicon Valley, where it hasn't been a particularly strong player, and Cornish & Carey would be able to move into San Francisco. Of course, the move might also have a diluting influence on their respective strengths, but those things are usually glossed over by the excitement of a deal like this one."

The nagging question of how to combine a regional, family-operated powerhouse like Cornish & Carey with a global corporate player such as CB is one with which the parties have yet to come to terms. "Cornish & Carey has a strong, local reputation on the Peninsula and in the Valley," says another source. "They are part of the fabric of the community. There is no doubt that CB would gain by being part of that. What I don't understand is what is in it for Cornish & Carey. I don't see them making a big dent in the San Francisco market."

Continue Reading for Free

Register and gain access to:

  • Breaking commercial real estate news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
  • Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
  • Critical coverage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.