"Through 2000 and early 2001, rents in the Bay Area were in a bubble with rents rising at unprecedented rates," says Jeffrey Mishkin, regional manager in the firm's San Francisco office. "Similar to the stock market, when the bubble burst, a downward correction ensued. Fortunately, rents are no longer perceived as over-inflated and the downtrend has come to an end."
The report predicts that 2,290 new units will enter the San Francisco market, while another 2,340 units will come online in the Oakland region over the next year. Combined, the new supply will represent a 2% increase in the local apartment stock. The limited amount of construction activity in San Francisco and Oakland, relative to existing product, will keep the markets from becoming excessively imbalanced.
"In 2001 vacancy in the San Francisco region jumped from 1.4 to 4.7%, while vacancy in the Oakland region climbed 2 percentage points, to 4.3%," reads the report. "As the Bay Area follows the nation into economic recovery in 2002, vacancy in the San Francisco and Oakland regions will stabilize at 4.7% and 4.5%, respectively. During 2001 the average vacancy rate in the San Francisco market tripled, ending the year at 4.7%. Owners in the Oakland MSA also experienced increased vacancy; the average rate increased by 2 percentage points to 4.3% during the year."
With 2001's rising vacancy came lower rental rates, resulting in a 12% decreases from the end of 2000. M&M says that through 2002, rents in both the San Francisco and Oakland regions will remain flat. Compared to last year, when many owners dropped rents significantly, zero rent growth will be viewed as a positive development. During the past 12 months, the average rent in the Oakland MSA slipped just 2%, while the average in the San Francisco market slid 12%. The greatest downward adjustments were experienced at the top end of the apartment market, where many luxury, Class A property owners reported cutting rents by up to 30% in order to attract tenants.
Over the past two years, owners have achieved an average rent growth of 6% per year due to significant rental increases in 2000. M&M says that local brokers have reported an increase in the availability of high-quality property in very desirable neighborhoods. "There are investors that have been waiting years to find available property in these areas; this helps to explain the increase in sales prices during 2001 when compared to 2000," says M&M. "Vacancy increased significantly last year and rents adjusted downward, yet prices continued to reflect tight market conditions. This trend also occurred in the San Jose region. Unlike the close correlation between vacancy and rent, where owners adjust rents almost immediately in order to fill vacancies, sales prices lag the change in rents by up to six months.
"Many brokers and owners are watching and waiting to see if the downward trend in market rents catches up with sales prices. Even if it does, price dips will be minimal and will occur during the first half of the year as owners typically hold properties rather than sell into a falling market, especially when there is evidence that conditions may be about to improve. During the second half of 2002, market stabilization and economic recovery will support values, and the expectation of improvement in 2003 may allow for continued escalation in prices."
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.
Once you are an ALM Digital Member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking commercial real estate news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical coverage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
*May exclude premium content© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.