"It defies belief that property owners could not have been aware," says one source who himself heard of valuation discrepancies as high as 20%. "Very simply, if you are a sophisticated property owner, you know everything about the properties that compete with you. Assessments are all a matter of public record. It's hard to believe you would not be suspicious of an assessment lower than yours on a building situated similarly to yours."
Another assessor who works in Manhattan says he's witnessed valuations with discrepancies as high as 50%. "We've lost business over the years because we tried to do things the right way," he told GlobeSt.com under condition of anonymity. "The city turned a blind eye toward the undervalued assessments but delayed legitmate firms that tried to work within the system."
"Considering the length of time that the alleged pattern of bribery took place and the widespread nature of the situation throughout Manhattan and other boroughs, one would be hard-pressed to believe that the scandal is limited only to consultants and occurred without the knowledge or perhaps the acquiescence of property owners," another source reflected.
Recommended For You
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.
Once you are an ALM Digital Member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking commercial real estate news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical coverage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
*May exclude premium content© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.