Spinola, in a March 21 address to the Standing Committee on Real Estate Taxation, called on the government to overhaul the complex assessment process created a decade ago by the Real Estate Board, then finance commissioner Carol O'Cleireacain and her deputy Martha Stark, the current commissioner. "There should be a simple explanation from the assessor of how the value was determined," he said.
His suggestions for streamlining the system included providing property owners with information about the cap rate used and why a building's income was rated as above or below market. "Owners send the city voluminous amounts of income and expense information as well as a roster of tenants and current leases," he stated. "In response, they should receive more than a single number stating the assessment without any justification or explanation."
Spinola acknowledged the inherent subjectivity of property assessments, pointing out "respected and impartial professionals could reasonably differ," on a valuation, making it "virtually impossible to detect criminal conduct." He also suggested that the city's offer to reduce the assessments of 101 of 562 properties identified in the recent valuation scandal indicates that those parcels were probably assessed too high initially.
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.
Once you are an ALM Digital Member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking commercial real estate news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical coverage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
*May exclude premium content© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.