On the subject "Businesses nolonger need to own and manage their own accommodation", opinion remainsperfectly split among the property directors of companies in Britain. Thatwas the title of a debate on board the MV Arcadia, venue for the PropertyForum.
After an hour of debate, the audience of delegates voted 50:50for the motion.
Many of the arguments centred on whether propertycompanies should go to a one-stop-shop for property services, or whetherthey should pick-and-mix. The director of property for a large telecomscompany which went for the one-stop-shop option commented: "Having gonethough the process, we end up with something enormously complex thatrequires a lot of management time."
What was universal was contempt forsale-and-leaseback deals. Even a banker said: "On the financial side, myexperience is that there was absolutely no meeting of minds between eitherside. We came away from the experience feeling that we had been used ascheap bridge finance. Once you get the deal signed, the two parties thenfall into their adversarial positions."
Where there was agreement wasthat modern property portfolio management has become overcomplicated. Theproperty directors at the Property Forum agreed they were looking forgreater simplicity from the property solutions providers.
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.
Once you are an ALM Digital Member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking commercial real estate news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical coverage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
*May exclude premium content© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
