PEACHTREE CITY, GA-Hours before their Superior Court trial was scheduled to start in Downtown Atlanta, Faison Enterprises of Charlotte, NC and joint venture developer Peachtree City Holdings settled their four-month-old dispute over the increased size of the 10-year-old Kedron Village Shopping Center at Peachtree Parkway and GA 74.The developers agreed to shrink their planned 265,000-sf addition to 212,000 sf but got to keep the size of the estimated $10 million Target Supercenter at 125,000 sf. They had planned to grow Kedron center to 400,000 sf and 1,652 parking spaces. With the settlement, the suburban community of 35,000 residents, 35 miles southwest of Downtown Atlanta, got a smaller project and a revised entrance design to the shopping center.The developers’ lawsuit alleged Peachtree City’s big-box ordinance was unconstitutional because it limited retail ventures to 32,000 sf. That amount of space amounted to illegal development restrictions, the suit alleges. A court ruling could have affected how other nearby communities vote on new retail enterprises, a decision Peachtree City government wanted to avoid, brokers tell GlobeSt.com.City council members still have to formally approve the project before its 15-month construction period can begin, area retail brokers familiar with the controversy tell GlobeSt.com.The developers lost round one when the Peachtree City planning commission unanimously voted to totally reject the shopping center addition in February. They also lost round two March 1 when a Superior Court judge in Atlanta ruled the controversial project must first go back to city council for a final vote before the decisions by the council and the planning commission are tested in court. Atlanta retail brokers following the controversy tell GlobeSt.com Faison lawyers, frustrated by the planning commission’s ruling and annoyed by growing residents’ opposition to the addition, decided to take the issue directly to court instead of waiting for a city council vote.The developers maintain the Target store development should be exempt from the master plan’s bylaws because the Target project’s plans had started before the city ordinance was adopted in November 2000. A third 150,000-sf phase development at the shopping center is still on the drawing boards.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:

  • Unlimited access to GlobeSt and other free ALM publications
  • Access to 15 years of GlobeSt archives
  • Your choice of GlobeSt digital newsletters and over 70 others from popular sister publications
  • 1 free article* every 30 days across the ALM subscription network
  • Exclusive discounts on ALM events and publications

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

GlobeSt

Join GlobeSt

Don't miss crucial news and insights you need to make informed commercial real estate decisions. Join GlobeSt.com now!

  • Free unlimited access to GlobeSt.com's trusted and independent team of experts who provide commercial real estate owners, investors, developers, brokers and finance professionals with comprehensive coverage, analysis and best practices necessary to innovate and build business.
  • Exclusive discounts on ALM and GlobeSt events.
  • Access to other award-winning ALM websites including ThinkAdvisor.com and Law.com.

Already have an account? Sign In Now
Join GlobeSt

Copyright © 2024 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.