In its letter to the Treasury Department, CIAT had pointed out that there was a gross misunderstanding on the topic of nuclear, biological or chemical risks in much of the insurance industry because, "there is no reference, of course, in TRIA to the terms 'nuclear,' 'radiological,' 'biological' or 'chemical.' Treasury Department executive director Jeffrey S. Bragg explained in the responding letter that TRIA calls for the government to take on a certain portion of an insurer's "insured losses" resulting from an act of terrorism, and that those "insured losses" do not exclude nuclear, biological or chemical risks.
Continue Reading for Free
Register and gain access to:
- Breaking commercial real estate news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical coverage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
