Representatives of the real estate community have been lobbying for such a ban for the past few years, citing competitive factors and the overall economic health of the country as reasons to oppose it. "We believe that the introduction of S.413 is a significant step in ensuring that banks cannot blend into commerce activities," a spokeswoman for the National Association of Realtors tells GlobeSt.com. "We are highly supportive of it."
NAR is currently conducting studies in-house that would better quantify the impact on the economy if banks were to enter this realm, she says. Anecdotal evidence of the dangers includes the S&L crash of the 1980s.
The next step in the process, according to NAR, is to put the Senate legislation for cloture vote. This hasn't been scheduled yet, and it may not come up until after the first recess.
NAR's lobbyists are watching the process closely, but cannot hazard a guess as to the bill's chances. "With a one-seat majority, getting any legislation through a cloture vote is tough, but we do feel good about it," she says.
Opponents of the bill, represented by such organizations as the American Bankers Association, portray the bill as protecting the real estate brokerages and service providers from competition. ABA could not be reached for comment in time.
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.
Once you are an ALM Digital Member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking commercial real estate news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical coverage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
*May exclude premium content© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.