Erika Morphy is co-editor of Debt and Equity Journal.
Washington, DC—Commercial property insurance policyholders are generally satisfied with proposed House legislation expanding the federal program to assist the insurance industry in the event of a major terrorist attack. In a vote late last month, the House approved the Terrorism Risk Insurance Revision and Extension Act of 2007, which extends the terrorism risk insurance program for 15 years. It also adds group life insurance, broadens the federal backstop to include domestic terrorism as well as support for damages caused by nuclear, biological, chemical or radiological attacks and adjusts the damage levels triggering coverage under the act.
However, if these additional measures actually become law, there could be dramatic increases in insurance premiums for conventional terrorism attacks. Worse, some industry experts say, if insurance against perils like nuclear attacks becomes available on the private market, lenders will likely insist on such coverage in their underwriting–and there are concerns such coverage could be prohibitively expensive.
“I think the law of unintended consequences will kick in,” says Aaron Davis, director of national property brokerage at Aon Corp., “because this type of coverage won't be subject to pricing controls. In addition, we think its inclusion could also be problematic because it could affect conventional terrorism pricing and capacity, making the latter more expensive and scarce.” While nuclear, biological and chemical threats are real and something for which the insurance and real estate industries must prepare, the immediate risks are conventional attacks, he says.
Another question mark, says Howard Mills, chief advisor with Deloitte & Touche USA LLP's insurance industry group and former superintendent of the New York State Insurance Dept., are the proposed caps on damages the insurance companies would have to pay. “If the final version includes support for nuclear, biological, chemical or radiological attacks, but leaves more of the conventional terrorism to private insurance with the federal backstop in place–that is, if the attachment point is higher than now anticipated–then insurance prices will undoubtedly rise in the private sector,” he predicts.
Most people watching the issue, including Davis and Mills, believe the final bill will represent a compromise. Both the Senate and President Bush have expressed reservations about the House bill.
“The Administration has voiced objections, but there are sufficient votes to override a veto,” Mills says. However, compromise is expected on the more controversial proposals, if only to ensure a new law is in place when the extension in the current one sunsets at the end of the year. “We'll know more what it looks like in about a month,” Mills says.
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.
Once you are an ALM Digital Member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking commercial real estate news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical coverage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
*May exclude premium content© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Erika Morphy
Erika Morphy has been writing about commercial real estate at GlobeSt.com for more than ten years, covering the capital markets, the Mid-Atlantic region and national topics. She's a nerd so favorite examples of the former include accounting standards, Basel III and what Congress is brewing.
