Some observers claim the initial effort generated substantial interest among the region's top real estate development firms. "I thought Staubach did a great job," says one Boston investor whose firm submitted a bid, while another source claimed there were as many as 17 offers filed. Various factors supposedly kept pricing down, including a fortress-like design featuring massive 50,000-sf floor plates and imposing interior columns that make it difficult to reposition as a multi-tenanted building. Redevelopment of the historic building is likely the only option, most agree. Also, Verizon supposedly needs to keep partial ownership to accommodate telecommunications equipment, making clear title harder to secure.
"It's a very complicated deal," says one source who surmises that Verizon did not take those issues into account when establishing a price minimum. The property was also pitched in the heat of the investment sales meltdown that began just as marketing commenced. By some estimates, Verizon was looking for more than $100 million above what the offers submitted, said to be running in the low $200-million range. Staubach officials declined comment on the matter when contacted by GlobeSt.com.
Although the Boston office of CBRE will participate in the process, observers claim the endeavor is being spearheaded by a New York City team that recently completed the sale of 375 Pearl St. in Manhattan on behalf of Verizon New York. That 32-story tower fetched $172.5 million, or about $185 per sf, from a partnership of Taconic Investment Partners and Square Mile Capital. CBRE brokers orchestrating the Pearl Street deal were Robert Alexander, William Shanahan and Robert Stillman. Calls to CBRE's Boston and New York offices were not returned, while Verizon officials also did not respond by deadline.
As for the new marketing program, the investor who previously bid on 185 Franklin St. says the firm will likely again pursue the opportunity. "It could be a very interesting play," says the source, citing the location and ability to deliver space quickly to a tight market. The source did, however, express doubts that Verizon will receive a markedly higher price than it did in the earlier effort. "If anything, you'd think it would be lower," says the investor, citing the austere financial climate and increased cost of debt going into the new year.
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.
Once you are an ALM Digital Member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking commercial real estate news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical coverage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
*May exclude premium content© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.