Of all the remaining presidential candidates, Barack Obama is the only one who even budgets a number for stepped up infrastructure investment. He calls for a timid $60 billion infusion. The Feds, states and cities combined spent about $140 billion on infrastructure in 2007. But a national commission report released in January states the country really needs to spend $225 billion annually on transport related projects for roads, rails, ports and airports. That doesn't include dealing with the country's aging levees (remember Katrina), crumbling dams, and questionable power grid (Tuesday's Florida blackout). Back in 2005, the American Society of Civil Engineers calculated the country had to spend $1.6 trillion to refurbish its infrastructure in the five years leading to 2010. Any way you look at, the USA isn't spending enough and must find a way to finance, build, and pay for new and improved infrastructure or face greater congestion, more pollution and new tragedy. How soon we all conveniently forget Minneapolis.
Facing recession, higher unemployment rates, increasing gasoline prices, lower home values and rising pricetags for food and clothes, Americans balk at the idea of new user fees, toll hikes, and more taxes. But we continue to want to buy big cars to drive to our big new houses all the way at the suburban fringe if need be. Oh, and don't forget the flat screen TV we need to purchase for that new house.
So politicians avoid facing people with hard facts. Following the example of Chicago (Skyway tolls) and Indiana (turnpike tolls), some governors examine ways to sell toll concessions from existing jewel infrastructure assets (the New Jersey and Pennsylvania Turnpikes) in order to help balance state budgets and keep from raising taxes or cutting too many services. In the meantime, they try to put off all but absolutely necessary capital projects.
At least, some states try to figure out how to tap new billion dollar private infrastructure funds raised by various banks and investment managers to finance projects -- Florida, California, Virginia and Texas take the lead. JP Morgan, Macquarie, ING, Morgan Stanley, the Carlyle Group and Goldman Sachs among others all have funds, hunting for opportunities. But the U.S. lags far behind the U.K, Australia, Canada and other European countries in working out concession protocols and best practices to get deals done. Most of the infrastructure investment funds choose to focus on opportunities outside the U.S. instead of spinning their wheels here in often fruitless and costly negotiations with state officials.
But the big bugaboo remains finding new revenue sources to pay for needed improvements. Another federal commission looks at replacing the nation's meager gas tax (19 cents a gallon) with satellite/transponder user fee technologies which can charge drivers by the mile, adding surcharges on heavier vehicles which spew more harmful emissions and cause more road wear and tear. Can you imagine the hysteria when people start opening monthly vehicle mileage bills and realize that roads aren't "free " anymore?
If we don't get a grip soon and find a way to pay the way, breaking that old SUV axle in some pot hole may be the least of our worries.
© Miller Ryan LLC 2008
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.
Once you are an ALM Digital Member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking commercial real estate news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical coverage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
*May exclude premium content© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.