Although Philadelphia's seven-year population decrease came in second only to that of Hurricane Katrina-ravaged New Orleans in terms of raw numbers, "it's 13th when you compare the percentage of population decline, which is a more appropriate indicator," Mark Schweiker, president and CEO of the Greater Philadelphia Chamber of Commerce, tells GlobeSt.com.
He adds, "while the population has been shrinking in Philadelphia since 2000, it's important to note that it's declining at a much slower rate." Between 2000 and 2001, Schweiker says, the city lost 1% of its population, but between 2006 and 2007 the rate of decline had tapered off to 0.25%.
The census bureau estimates that Philadelphia lost 67,916 residents between 2000 and 2007, a 4.5% population decline that exceeded that any city in the top 25. During this time, Philadelphia slipped from fifth to sixth largest US city behind Phoenix, which has a population estimated at 1.52 million compared to Philadelphia's 1.45 million. That compares to a loss of 245,550 residents in New Orleans, occurring mostly in the wake of Katrina. Interestingly, last year New Orleans' population began rebounding, increasing nearly 14% between 2006 and 2007.
Philadelphia's gradual population decline—it peaked at 2.1 million in 1950 and has eroded ever since—is not surprising, Schweiker says. "Cities in the Northeast Corridor have been losing population for many years, especially compared to the Sun Belt region," he says, citing Chicago, Cleveland, Pittsburgh and Baltimore as examples. "And cities where the population is growing, including New York City and Boston, attribute it entirely to immigration."
Philadelphia, says Schweiker, shares some of the problems of all major cities, which include "declining blue-collar jobs, a struggling public school system and safety concerns." Nevertheless, he adds that the slowing rate of decline reflects "an increase in the number of people moving back into the city from suburbs, and also to young adults--especially college graduates--choosing to settle in the city."
Other factors in the city's favor, Schweiker says include the quality of life in Center City, job growth in key sectors, the city's residential property tax abatement program, and a shift in preferences away from suburban locations and sprawl to urban location by some demographics, including empty nesters and young singles.
At the same time, the bureau's report shows that the Philadelphia metro area experienced a 2.5% population increase between 2000 and 2007. "While the city has been relatively flat for employment, jobs are growing in suburbs, albeit at a slower rate. Other reasons include education, safety, taxes, and the housing and credit crunch," Schweiker says.
The problems facing Philadelphia, points out Schweiker, are long-term, and he praises Mayor Michael Nutter for "working on a host of these fronts to find solutions." One result, he says, is that violent crime decreased "substantially" in the first six months of the year.
Another critical component is that city government is becoming "much more business friendly on several fronts, including continuing reductions in the city wage and business privilege taxes," says Schweiker. "Making the city more competitive through reductions in business taxes could mean more jobs. Other solutions could include anticipated casino revenues to reduce wage and property taxes."
He points out that a recent CareerBuilder.com survey ranked Philadelphia number one for college graduates when considering availability of jobs, wages, cost of living "and especially housing and quality of life."
Spencer Yablon, manager of corporate affairs for Marcus & Millichap's Philadelphia office, notes that the city's tax burden is still high, and that burden belies the fact that the metro area is cited as relatively affordable compared to the cost of living in New York or Boston. "It is more cost effective for developers to build and for businesses to locate outside of the city limits," Yablon tells GlobeSt.com. "Unlike the aforementioned cities, you can live in the suburbs outside of Philadelphia and still be a 15- to 25-minute car ride from downtown."
Yablon says the residential shift toward the Pennsylvania and New Jersey suburbs is "more of a shift to transit oriented living. Apartment renters, condominium owners and single family homeowners are more often taking the train into the city given the rising cost of gas."
In Philadelphia's favor, however, is its location and ease of access to other East Coast cities, "with major highways leading to New York, New Jersey, Delaware and Maryland, as well as a major airport 15 minutes from downtown." He adds, "major employers in the city are extremely stable and are anchored by the education and healthcare. Softening of the business privilege tax would persuade businesses to stay in Philadelphia and would entice others to strongly consider relocating here."
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.
Once you are an ALM Digital Member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking commercial real estate news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical coverage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
*May exclude premium content© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.