DeBoer began with the traditional warning: "I'm here from Washington [DC] and I'm here to help." The dominating issue at hand in commercial real estate, DeBoer pointed out, is value and how this will be handled through enacted programs and legislation.

As DeBoer says he explained to government officials, "Commercial real estate debt is like vintages of wine. There are good vintages and bad vintages." Real estate value in the country measures at roughly $6.5 trillion, which currently is split almost 50/50 between debt and equity, he explained, whereas it used to be around $1 trillion of debt--meaning it tripled over the last year or so. About 83% of that debt comes from banks and CMBS. And the clock is ticking for a resolution, since about $1.2 trillion will come due between 2010 and 2011, DeBoer said, highlighting the problem, since "sources of capital are gone when debt has come due."

The issue begs the question: How does CRE close the bid-ask gap? DeBoer said the Real Estate Roundtable was focusing on a few key points, which it was recommending to the government:

1. Federal Credit Agency for commercial real estate. DeBoer indicated the necessity for a credit facility that acted as a "credit card for financing new originations;"
2. Stop Banking Coagulants. TARP was originally supposed to do this, he points out, but was shifted to shoring up companies. DeBoer feels the government needs to find a way to facilitate workouts and extensions of loans to CMBS;
3. Changing mark-to-market rules. They are pro-cyclical, DeBoer explained, and as banks continue to mark down assets, it raises capital on the other side of the equation causing the banks not to lend;
4. Help refinancing of new loans coming due, since there is little equity. DeBoer looks to loosening tax restraints on foreign investors, incentivizing investment in US equity;
5. Doing away with the growing notion of a tax hike on carried interest, which is a higher return to a general investor that is positively disproportionate to the original investment, essentially a reward for taking on risk.

   [IMGCAP(2)]Schechner expanded on the notion of how TARP, TALF and, eventually, PPIP can work to the favor of CRE with some guidance. He notes that TALF, as it stands, is not yet addressing the "wall of maturities" which are "non-financeable" and will arrive by 2011. There will be a "TALF 2.0" to address these issues, he surmised, but it has not been completely worked out yet at the governmental level. The "good news" is that Washington acknowledges the on-coming problems within commercial real estate.