In Fumo v. City of Philadelphia, the court said its earlier ruling that found the state delegated to the city its power to license the land under Act 321 of 1907 meant the two groups' arguments failed.

While the ruling, issued by Chief Justice Ronald D. Castille, found that the state legislators had standing to claim the city's Commerce Department's issuance of the license was improper because only the General Assembly can grant such rights, it found the claim was without merit based on HSP Gaming . The court ruled the legislators do not have standing to challenge the issuance of the license under the theory that the Commerce Department didn't require HSP to produce a proper deed or title.

Castille said City Council, led in this suit by Councilman Frank DiCicco, did not have standing to challenge the license on the grounds the city lacked authority to issue it.

Continue Reading for Free

Register and gain access to:

  • Breaking commercial real estate news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
  • Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
  • Critical coverage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.