Sapir had filed a lawsuit on August 7 against Green and Gramercy that was subsequently withdrawn. According to the court documents, Sapir charged that both Green and Gramercy "deliberately prevented plaintiffs (Sapir) from satisfying the conditions precedent to an extension of the maturity date so they can rely on such failure in denying plaintiffs (Sapir) request to extend the maturity date and thereby seize the buildings for themselves."
Sources tell GlobeSt.com that the two lenders reached a fairly quick agreement that S.L. Green would take over the building's leasing and management in concert with the fact the loan was going into special services.
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.
Once you are an ALM Digital Member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking commercial real estate news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical coverage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
*May exclude premium content© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
