The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. is working furiously on many fronts to fulfill its mission: buttressing-or not, as the case may be-the solvency of the country's banks. In the case of the latter, the FDIC's marching orders then become to dispense of the seized assets as productively as possible on behalf of us taxpayers. One byproduct of the agency's involvement in the market is that distressed debt valuations have become less- than - transparent.

Lessons from Lennar Consider, for example, builder Lennar Corp.s foray into the distressed market. In mid-February the home builder turned-distressed investor acquired a portfolio of 5,500 residential and commercial real estate loans in a FDIC auction. Lennar paid $243 million for a 40% stake in the properties-with the remainder held by FDIC. Commentary in the Wall Street Journal on the transaction said the deal showed that while the FDIC wasn't selling assets at rock-bottom prices it proved willing to subsidize the sale. Arguably, because FDIC provided zero financing and kept a significant stake in the project, Lennar could have afforded to pay more. Thus the market still has no clear-cut idea of the value of that particular portfolio.

"We are seeing the same dynamic in other aspects of government rescue programs," says one attorney involved in such transactions. "The Treasury Department's PPIP program is, in fact, driving up prices of distressed assets. What is happening-at least according to rumors-is that investors snapped up distressed assets before the program got off the ground, but after it was announced. Why? To sell them to the government at inflated prices."

The PPIP managers have been closed-mouthed about their investing activities, of course, this attorney says he believes the talk is true because distressed assets have been pricing higher than many had expected.

Securitizing Distressed Assets

One initiative the FDIC is expected to launch this year, however, might add some stability and transparency to distressed pricing. The agency has all but officially acknowledged it intends to securitize distressed assets that it has seized from banks.

In the long run, such a program could provide a strong sense of valuations, according to Patrick Sargent, a partner in the Dallas offices of Andrews Kurth LLP, and president of the Commercial Mortgage Securities Association.

"The FDIC has a lot of product, which is unfortunate for the system, but it's important to get really close to valuations that people will acknowledge as accurate," Sargent says.

"We're seeing widely varying appraisal amounts." He continues, "We've got to get 'price discovery' in order to find out where valuations really are. Once people are comfortable with that, there are many investors on the sidelines waiting for what they perceive to be the bottom and valuations that they can justify."

Much depends on the details of the program, which have not been released. Indeed, while the FDIC has discussed the likelihood of such transactions publicly, it has not officially unveiled such a program.

Many in the industry assume it will happen, though. "The FDIC was seeking a financial advisor as early as last August," says Kenneth Kohler, a partner at Morrison & Foerster. "So this has been percolating for some time. That tells me two things: it is not on a fast track and FDIC is serious about it."

Jumpstarting CMBS

Besides stabilizing distressed pricing, a FDIC-backed securitization would also give a much-needed boost to the barely-emerging CMBS market.

The agency, quite obviously, is borrowing a page from the RTC era, says Brian Olasov, managing director for the Atlanta office of international law firm McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP. "The CMBS market grew out of what had been these non-performing commercial loan securitizations by the Resolution Trust Corp.

"The securitizations of non-performing loans from failed thrifts proved to be very successful," he says. "Ultimately the bonds not offered to the marketplace at the time were offered up in later years when the market was more receptive. The government made quite a bit of money from the later sale of those certificates."

It is not that simple, though, to apply the old lessons. Much is dependent on two factors, Olasov says: "the rate of failed institutions and the cost of resolving those institutions relative to the cost of securitization. That is an analysis that FDIC has to make."

A successful FDIC securitization, Kohler and Olasov both say, would also deliver a strong psychological boost to the market. "There is still a certain amount of demonization of securitization that would be offset by the government's own endorsement of securitization," Kohler says.

That boost, though, might be more subdued if FDIC actually guaranteed the securities-essentially equating them to Fannie and Freddie, he adds. "In a way it would be a slightly different market proposition because they would seem to be more in the same class as government securities."

In the short run, Kohler speculates, it could have a slightly negative impact depending on the terms and rates of the securities. "What we are talking about here is putting more supply on the market, and that should put pressure on prices in the short term."

Other Options

There are other paths FDIC could through a structured sale rather than a securitization.

"You have to remember that a lot of stuff the community banks are dealing with is construction loans, land loans, and so on," Sher says. For a securitization to work, the majority of these assets have to be performing, which they are not."That's where you're going to see a bit of a difference between the late 90s and early 2000." He continues, "It's not going to be pooling a whole bunch of garbage, it's going to be really focused on performing loans because people don't want to get burned."


GlobeSt.com News Hub is your link to relevant real estate and business stories from other local, regional and national publications.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Once you are an ALM Digital Member, you’ll receive:

  • Breaking commercial real estate news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
  • Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
  • Critical coverage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.