NEWARK-Taking a cue from a long-used commercial real estate strategy, the city is planning to sell municipal buildings to help close an $83-million budget shortfall, the Star-Ledger reported Wednesday. Under a plan released Tuesday, the Essex County Improvement Authority will sell bonds to buy the properties, including police precincts, firehouses and office buildings, then lease them back to Newark. The city hopes to raise $50 million through the sale. Andy Zezas, SIOR partner and GlobeSt.com blogger points out that the state of New Jersey and a few other city governments have looked into this option as well, so the plan isn’t radical for its originality.

Sale-leasebacks, as a whole, are a short-term solution. Much like a cash advance from a credit card, it may end up costing more in the long-run, as essentially the cost of the property plus interest is paid back over the lease-term. Zezas notes, if the city of Newark is doing this strategically and perhaps getting out of the building at the end of the term, either through the building’s obsolescence or otherwise, then it might be a smart play. “But if this is merely creative structured finance,” he explains out. “Over a longer period of time, they will have jeopardized the financial future of Newark. And at some point, the risk is, the city could be worse off.”

The question is if Newark has a financial future at all should the plan not pass. Driving the sale-leaseback proposal is the city’s looming budget crisis. If the sale-leaseback scenario or a viable alternative doesn’t come through, Newark may have to raise taxes by 30%. And even with the approved proposal, the city may still have to impose a 20% property tax increase and lay off 600 employees.

The plan is expected to cost the city $60 million in the long term, factoring in capital improvements, fees and services. There is no announced timeline as yet, which leaves the final cost an estimation of adding $10 million to the city’s current debt later for $50 million now.

And the plan will require its own short-term solution, needing quick approval at municipal, county and state levels if it’s going to have its intended effect: the city needs to have the $50 million in its coffers by mid-November in order to present a balanced budget and avoid a possible state takeover. So whether or not it’s the right thing, it might be the only option left.

“The city of Newark’s contemplation to enter into sale-leaseback strategies is in keeping with some of the best financial minds in the state,” Zezas says. “However, in the long-run, leasebacks may not prove to be the least costly solution for the city.”

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Once you are an ALM Digital Member, you’ll receive:

  • Breaking commercial real estate news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
  • Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
  • Critical coverage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Paul Bubny

Paul Bubny is managing editor of Real Estate Forum and GlobeSt.com. He has been reporting on business since 1988 and on commercial real estate since 2007. He is based at ALM Real Estate Media Group's offices in New York City.