PHOENIX-“Get back to selling your hotel and stop relying on someone else to do it,” said Jim Anhut, chief development officer-the Americas, InterContinental Hotels Group, regarding the Online Travel Alliance. He said it was important to use them as a channel in the marketplace, but to control them by controlling inventory that is allowed into the system. He noted it was also important to work the government side to stay competitive. Joel Eisemann, EVP, owner and franchise services and select service & extended stay lodging development, Marriot International, Inc., concurred nothing that all the large brands have active ecommerce groups. The more important questions, Eisemann felt, were who the online agencies pay taxes to for the revenue of selling a room. It was jurisdictional issue that was still unresolved and a looming issue for hoteliers.

A panel heavy with developers gathered on Thursday morning to discuss OTAs, managing brands, and cost-shaving, among other pertinent topics of the moment. Jeff Weinstein, editor-in-chief of HOTELs Magazine/Hotels Investment Outlook moderated the panel, which consisted of Anhut; Eisemann; Thorsten Kirschke, EVP and COO, Carlson Hotels-the Americas; Thomas R. Magnuson, CEO/principal, Magnuson Hotels; Joseph A. McInerney, president and CEO, AH&LA; and Paul Sacco, SVP, development-North America, Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc.

OTAs were a prime subject of the panel, as McInerny noted that that a about 10 years ago, a large brand had looked into creating its own online search engine to compete with the OTAs emergence, but it couldn’t compete and eventually sold its platform, which then turned into Pricline.com. Sacco said that if you keep focus on the brand the customers will “key into it,” regardless of how they purchase the room.

Magnuson, working mostly with independents, was of a different mindset regarding the OTAs. “We want as much distribution as possible,” he explained. “We only care about revenue.” He emphasized his point by explaining that Magnuson Hotels had just signed deals with Expedia and Hotwire, saying distribution was key in tough times. Changing rates to keep things alive, he said, was sometimes necessary. Kirschke felt there was a more direct solution, which was to invest in brands own technology, updating company websites which were lagging the market and, as such, not as competitive.

The preparation for the a prolonged down economy could keep some hotels floating while others fail and the panel zeroed in on what needs to be done to stay in the game. “Plan for a range of scenarios,” Sacco said. Starwood, he explained, was seeing an uptick in business travel, as well as some upward trends in occupancy and RevPAR, but it was unclear how steep those would be. Eisemann concurred saying, “Some positive things happened to the industry during the downturn.” He felt as a whole, the hotel industry has been good about looking at its books and creating a more efficient model for the times, but worried that as the economy returned, some hotels would add back features much too quickly.

McInerney said it could not be helped, that the anxious rush back to the old model seemed to happen after every down cycle, despite the lessons which should have been learned. He also explained that as the industry began to show profits again, the irony was that it would be harder to explain to the government why the industry needs money to survive. Magnuson was more dire, “This is bigger than a cycle, this is a major shift.” Magnuson felt the pared down model was the way of the future for most hotels.

A major question for hoteliers is how to develop property in a tight lending environment. Kirschke said, “You have to know exactly what you’re after.” He said the only way to do a development or redevelopment right now as to strategically plan what you want to do and accomplish. There wasn’t an option for other plans.

Finally, a hurdle facing every hotel across the country is how to keep costs low while revenue is eroding. Eisemann noted some of the issues that will face hoteliers in the next few months and years will be reinstating salary increases, whether or not to charge for high-speed internet or give it away, and the advent of technology and media driving revenue down on hotel televisions. He felt the best approach will be to examine brand standards and figure out if it was necessary and important to the customer, removing things to provide additional product. “It’s a math game,” Sacco summed up.

Eisemann also explained that “now’s the time” to drive rate increases. This was not a cure-all for revenue erosion, however. Eisemann noted that it was important to stay vigilant on cost. Magnuson disagreed with driving rates at this point in the economy. “You can’t drive rates and ignore supply and demand.” His solution was to position companies well online and hold-out for supply to tighten up. “Customers know the industry is running with 40% empty rooms every night,” Magnuson said, noting that guests with that kind of knowledge won’t pay a higher rate.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Once you are an ALM Digital Member, you’ll receive:

  • Breaking commercial real estate news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
  • Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
  • Critical coverage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.