CENTURY CITY, CA-The pace of REO sales and foreclosures is quickening, although the deal volume remains nowhere near the flow that was once expected, according to speakers at Reznick and Ballard Spahr’s ‘Strategies and Solutions for Real Estate Workout and Recapitalization Challenges,’ an event held here Wednesday. GlobeSt.com joined approximately 50 industry executives at the Hyatt Century Plaza in Los Angeles, to hear panelists discuss successful strategies and break down case studies in role-playing scenarios. The event was co-hosted by Reznick Group, a national CPA firm providing accounting, tax and business advisory services to clients nationwide, and by Ballard Spahr LLP, which has more than 475 lawyers in 12 offices in the US.

Jim Vincent, a senior managing director of Reznick Restructuring Solutions, explained that one of the things that have changed about the distress market is that it isn’t just loans that are now being sold. “There is some headway. We are starting to see REO and foreclosures pick up, although it isn’t at the rate people expected,” Vincent said. Vincent served as moderator of a panel titled, “Workout & Recapitalization Strategies,” which addressed the current market and a variety of workout and recapitalization strategies and solutions from the debtor/creditor side, along with considerations of tax/structuring implications.

Panelist Ryan Krauch, a principal at Mesa West Capital, like Vincent, said that generally he has seen more activity from the banks, but pointed out that “everything is relative.” What he is seeing is more banks willing to foreclose on assets and more aggressive restructures.

According to Nick Mosich, a managing partner at Ion Capital Partners LLC, “It depends on the bank’s capital structure and is a case-by-case basis―and also a regional basis.” Mosich cited the “much tougher regulatory environment” in the industry today and added, “I think the bank closures this year have not ramped up as quickly as we had expected. We are seeing, from our own bank, much tougher regulatory scrutiny.”

What is important to understand, according to Jeff Pitcher, a partner at Ballard Spahr LLP, is the ramp-up in the special servicer load. “The special servicers and asset managers I talk to now have 40 to 70 assets that one person has got, so they don’t really have a lot of time to focus on any particular one asset,” he said. “Six to eight months ago, they weren’t as willing to do as much loan modifications, but now they are, but you have to have a good proposal going in.” He added: “When you run out of time, you are going to get foreclosed on. That is what I am seeing.”

Panelists switched gears a bit to discuss bidding on FDIC notes, and Mosich pointed out that “you are buying those notes with a ‘the worst can happen’ type mindset.” He explains that when looking at bank files, “you might be lucky to have any information like a tenantive map or three-year-old appraisal and some sort of entitlement document and that is it.” In short, it is very tough to buy from the FDIC, panelists said, and yet they pointed out that there still has been some aggressive bidding on them. “The other thing we are seeing,” Mosich said, “is that it is taking a significant amount of time for the buyer to figure out what they have bought, which is a tough road to go down.”

From a tax perspective, Thomas Alvarez, a senior manager at Reznick Group PC, explained that one thing in this environment that would be the “bad and the ugly” in the “good, the bad, and the ugly” scenario is phantom taxable income. “If you don’t structure the deal the right way, it is scary stuff,” he said. “It is really crucial to cross your ‘I’s’ and dot your ‘t’s’.”

When discussing typical workout strategies and options, panelists pointed to: maturity date extension; additional funding; interest rate reduction/amortization relief; principal balance reduction; A/B note split; relief from personal guaranty; white knight/rescue financing; short sale; deed-in-lieu of foreclosure; foreclosure; and bankruptcy.

The one strategy or option that Krauch doesn’t like on the list is bankruptcy. “We are on the lending side. We don’t want to own these things,” he said. “What lenders want is to first get paid off, and if that can’t happen, they want to get further away from the fire.”

Alvarez explained the potential risk of buying discounted paper. “If an acquirer of distressed debt later negotiates and knocks it down, well, it sounds great, but that creates income. The acquirer then has phantom income,” he said. “The rules that govern this area are a mix of the original discount rules that were written before the distressed debt market.” He added that “Unfortunately, unless it gets resolved, there can be a big surprise with a significant tax bill.”

When discussing how to access deal flow as an investor, panelists pointed out a lot of scenarios that do not work. Mosich said to not call up a chief workout person at a bank because they get 100 calls a day. Instead, he said, “Focus on assets that are listed through brokerages where there is a clear mandate to sell.”

Pitcher advised the audience to not waste their time. “Don’t call the attorney to pass along the information because it never works.”

When a member from the audience asked if it is smart to reach out to the existing borrower to see if they need an equity partner since they already have contact with the bank, panelists agreed that it wasn’t a bad idea. But overall, they said it is a lot about being in the right place at the right time.

Other key panelists at the half-day event included: David Barksdale, partner and co-chair of distressed real estate initiative at Ballard Spahr; Jeff Giller, managing partner and chief investment officer at Clairvue Capital Partners; Jim Hibbert, a senior manager at Reznick Group, Peter O’Keefe, senior vice president at Lowe Enterprises Inc.; and Dean Waldt, a partner at Ballard Spahr.

Continue Reading for Free

Register and gain access to:

  • Breaking commercial real estate news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
  • Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
  • Critical coverage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Natalie Dolce

Natalie Dolce, editor-in-chief of GlobeSt.com and GlobeSt. Real Estate Forum, is responsible for working with editorial staff, freelancers and senior management to help plan the overarching vision that encompasses GlobeSt.com, including short-term and long-term goals for the website, how content integrates through the company’s other product lines and the overall quality of content. Previously she served as national executive editor and editor of the West Coast region for GlobeSt.com and Real Estate Forum, and was responsible for coverage of news and information pertaining to that vital real estate region. Prior to moving out to the Southern California office, she was Northeast bureau chief, covering New York City for GlobeSt.com. Her background includes a stint at InStyle Magazine, and as managing editor with New York Press, an alternative weekly New York City paper. In her career, she has also covered a variety of beats for M magazine, Arthur Frommer's Budget Travel, FashionLedge.com, and Co-Ed magazine. Dolce has also freelanced for a number of publications, including MSNBC.com and Museums New York magazine.