MIAMI-Bulk buyers bet heavily on distressed condos, spending nearly $2.1 billion on 9.7 million square feet of space in South Florida since July 2008—but the early returns aren’t what many hoped. About half of the more than 70 condo bulk transactions for distressed units across South Florida are being resold to individual buyers at an average rate of $51 per square foot. So says a new report from Condo Vultures.

"Bulk condo buyers are reselling units at an average premium of 24%, which at first glance seems to fall in the range of every investment group's expected return," says Peter Zalewski, a principal with the Bal Harbour, FL-based real estate consultancy Condo Vultures LLC. "The issue is, the $51 per square foot average premium is a gross amount that does not factor in carrying costs, real estate commissions, marketing fees, and any sales incentives. Once these additional costs are factored in, the net profits are likely to erode for inferior properties."

According to recorded deeds in Miami-Dade, Broward and Palm Beach Counties, private equity groups and institutional investors that purchased distressed condos in packages of at least 10 units for an average price of $215 per square foot during the last 30 months are now reselling on a retail basis at an average price of $266 per square foot. To date, bulk buyers have already resold 25% of the nearly 7,900 newly constructed or converted condo units acquired in distressed transactions in the tri-county area since July 2008.

Zalewski says the typical strategy for bulk buyers with condo product on the books is to sell some units at a premium rate to reduce the cost basis of the deal while developing a longer-term plan that involves leasing out less desirable units. Indeed, Jack McCabe, principal analyst at Deerfield Beach-based McCabe Research & Consulting, tells GlobeSt.com that the 24% average premium is likely based on selling the best units, and even still may result in less than 12% profit. Then there are the less attractive units on lower floors that offer even less upside—if they sell at all.

“While these bulk buyers may have made some minimal profits on the best units, it will be interesting to see what the total sell out divided by the total number of units equates to,” McCabe says. “I still firmly believe that in many cases bulk buyers overpaid for these acquisitions in the last three years and it will probably be the second company into the deal that will actually make the profits.”

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Once you are an ALM Digital Member, you’ll receive:

  • Breaking commercial real estate news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
  • Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
  • Critical coverage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.