[IMGCAP(1)] “The ‘buy-and-flip’ model is a sucker’s bet. It’s about building real, generational wealth.”

I recently read this quote from Greg Rand, a 20-year real estate veteran and author of Crash-Boom. At first glance, I am not so sure I agree, but I guess it must depend on what you are buying and you are flipping. Perhaps my vision is skewed.

My husband and I recently bought a home in North Orange County, CA from a group of investors that had acquired the property from foreclosure for SIGNIFICANTLY less money only three months before. They put in a few dollars and flipped it, and it was their 100th flipped home in 2010. (Way to finish up a year!)

There are so many get-rich-quick schemes out there that it makes your head spin, but I see what these investors did as a practical way to achieve millionaire status, so I guess my question to Rand is, how in the world are these guys’ suckers?

And on that note, how long do you have to hold a property to sell before it is not a case of “flipping?” Before the downturn, lots of investors made money by buying commercial properties, holding them for a few years and then selling them. That’s not exactly flipping, but it’s not holding them for the long-term either.

My thought is that maybe it’s not so much a question of whether you are flipping or holding for the long term, it’s more a question of whether you know what you are doing or not. If you pay far too much for something and then prices plunge, isn’t it just as likely to go belly-up regardless of whether your intention was to flip it or to hold it for the long term?

Most likely, lots of people who were hoping to flip properties lost a lot of money when housing prices plunged. But that’s not because flipping is inherently unwise. (I think it’s because they foolishly believed that prices would continue to rise above their already inflated levels).

Perhaps I am the sucker. I quickly realized the true condition of the home after the first rain storm, and am learning that fancy-looking granite and cabinet upgrades don’t necessarily translate to good material use. I would flip this house if I could.

Continue Reading for Free

Register and gain access to:

  • Breaking commercial real estate news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
  • Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
  • Critical coverage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Natalie Dolce

Natalie Dolce, editor-in-chief of GlobeSt.com and GlobeSt. Real Estate Forum, is responsible for working with editorial staff, freelancers and senior management to help plan the overarching vision that encompasses GlobeSt.com, including short-term and long-term goals for the website, how content integrates through the company’s other product lines and the overall quality of content. Previously she served as national executive editor and editor of the West Coast region for GlobeSt.com and Real Estate Forum, and was responsible for coverage of news and information pertaining to that vital real estate region. Prior to moving out to the Southern California office, she was Northeast bureau chief, covering New York City for GlobeSt.com. Her background includes a stint at InStyle Magazine, and as managing editor with New York Press, an alternative weekly New York City paper. In her career, she has also covered a variety of beats for M magazine, Arthur Frommer's Budget Travel, FashionLedge.com, and Co-Ed magazine. Dolce has also freelanced for a number of publications, including MSNBC.com and Museums New York magazine.