WASHINGTON, DC—Depending on how you look at the results, the Federal Reserve's release in mid-March of its annual stress test on the leading 19 US banks either shows that safeguards put in place since the economic downturn are working, or that the government is far too stringent in its methodology. The latter claim comes from the four banks—New York City-based Citi and MetLife, Atlanta-based SunTrust and Detroit-based Ally Financial—that were deemed by the Fed to have failed the Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review test.
Granted, the Fed said in a statement that the stress test scenario estimates "are the outcome of deliberately stringent and conservative estimates under hypothetical, adverse conditions." The scenario, enacted to see if the banks could handle another crash in the market, included a peak unemployment rate of 13%, a 50% drop in equity prices and a 21% decline in housing prices. "Strong capital levels are critical to ensuring that banking organizations have the ability to lend and to continue to meet their financial obligations, even in times of economic difficulty," the Fed said.
Many of the banks that passed the test, including JPMorgan Chase, U.S. Bancorp, BB&T and Wells Fargo, touted the results, and announced plans to pay higher dividends and increased schedules on stock buyback from federal debt. Jamie Dimon, chairman and CEO at JPMorgan, said the company is pleased with the results. "JPMorgan Chase continues to invest in substantial organic growth opportunities as our top priority and best use of capital," Dimon said in a statement. "We expect to repurchase, at a minimum, approximately the same amount of shares that we issue for employee stock-based incentive awards. Beyond this, we intend to repurchase equity only when we are generating capital in excess of what we need to fund our organic growth and when we think it provides excellent value to our existing shareholders."
In separate statements, the four banks that failed the test disputed the results as too stringent, unfairly weighted and/or not considerate of capital reserves. The banks said they will submit revised capital plans to the Fed, and will try to understand better the stress models, though they protested that they meet strict safety standards. "Using our own modeling techniques— which have shown to have a high level of predictability—SunTrust's estimates for loan losses and pre-provision net revenue in the Supervisory Stress scenario are significantly more favorable than those made by the Federal Reserve," said Aleem Gillani, Sun's chief financial officer.
MetLife chairman, president and CEO Steven Kandarian said in a statement that his company should be considered differently. "We do not believe that the bankcentric methodologies used under the CCAR are appropriate for insurance companies, which operate under a different business model," he said.
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.
Once you are an ALM Digital Member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking commercial real estate news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical coverage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
*May exclude premium content© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.