Policies supporting the construction of high-speed rail are getting back on track and gaining speed on the federal level. On July 9, Amtrak released a plan for the Northeast Corridor outlining its long-term vision to accommodate more trains operating at faster speeds, with significantly reduced trip times and improved service reliability. It also called for the development of the next generation of high-speed rail, reaching speeds of 220 mph among four major hubs: Boston, New York City, Philadelphia and Washington, DC.

The study—marking the third update in the conceptual development and planning process for the Northeast "megaregion"provides input for a new environmental analysis and master plan initiative led by the Federal Railroad Administration. Under the new proposal, travel times would shrink to 37 minutes from New York to Philadelphia and 94 minutes from New York to Washington, DC, promising increased commuter efficiency and encouraging economic development across the region.

"It's meeting a need for fast, frequent transportation among the major economic centers of the Northeast," says Petra Todorovich, director of America 2050 at the Regional Plan Association. "Every city in the corridor would be within an hour-and-a-half of New York City. It changes the relationship between these places."

Amtrak initially released two preliminary reports about highspeed rail in 2010, but those ended up being scrapped. Under the new Amtrak proposal, the plan calls for the development of Moynihan Station, a $267-million project that will create a new intercity train hall for Amtrak within the Farley Post Office Building across from the existing Pennsylvania Station in Midtown Manhattan. In addition, a new high-speed rail station would be developed at Market East in Center City Philadelphia, a location closer to the convention center and the Downtown area than the existing 30th Street Station.

Todorovich says the addition of the new station can help transform Philadelphia—primarily known for education and medical facilities—into more of a class A office destination. "By having their station at Market East, you make that area much more attractive for developing office buildings, and that's an area where landowners have had office buildings or pedestals or pads for a long time and haven't developed them because the demand is just not there."

Another major ongoing effort is a $450-million project funded by the FRA to improve service along a 24-mile section of the NEC between Trenton and New Brunswick, NJ. Further north in Connecticut, Amtrak is nearing the completion of a $140-million project to replace the 104-year old movable Niantic River Bridge in East Lyme, CT.

The new proposal comes at a time when growth in the Northeast is only expected to expand. According to the report, roughly 15 million additional residents will live in the Northeast by the year 2050, a 30% increase to 65 million. And despite the fact that economic growth is projected at a 1.8% annual rate over the next 40 years, the NEC, according to Amtrak, is "operating at or near capacity" and frequently experiences congestion and delays. The study also forecasts a 25% increase in ridership and revenue over 2010 projections.

Karen Rae, deputy administrator of the Federal Railroad Administration, said at a recent Professional Women in Construction forum that the federal investment strategy under the Obama administration aims to create rail development that will reach 80% of people over the next 25 years, an investment that can cost up to $2.5 billion. A big chunk of this investment involves $806 million devoted solely to Amtrak improvements from Boston to Philadelphia, including major infrastructure work and highspeed rail technology.

At the same time, opportunity for new revenue remains strong. Todorovich says the proposal has the potential to generate $4.9 billion in annual revenues by 2040 and creates more opportunity for real estate development to spring up around the transit hubs. "The NEC is attractive for investment because it's a proven market," she says. "None of the international experts have any doubt that this is a very strong market for highspeed rail service. It's just a question of funding and the political will to make it happen."

Just a few weeks ago, Congress passed a transportation bill (also known as MAP-21), which reauthorizes the federal aid highway program, eliminates earmarks and strengthens the Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Program to leverage federal dollars further. But despite political handclapping on both sides of the aisle, high-speed rail didn't get a title.

However, Todorovich says the bill is not an immediate concern because planners and policy makers are already looking toward the future. "We understand that there will be multiple bills in Congress before high-speed rail is built in the Northeast Corridor," she says. "This is a very long-term planning effort."

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Once you are an ALM Digital Member, you’ll receive:

  • Breaking commercial real estate news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
  • Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
  • Critical coverage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.