CLEVELAND—The US housing market has begun to rebound, but many areas of the country still suffer lingering effects from the recession. This is especially true in states, such as Ohio, with many older industrial cities that had profoundly troubled markets even before the housing bubble popped. The Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland recently released a staff report titled Policy Considerations for Improving Ohio's Housing Markets, which puts forward several recommendations to help the state get past these hurdles including:
- Instituting a foreclosure fast track for vacant and abandoned properties
- Eliminating the minimum bid requirements at sheriff sales
- Addressing harmful speculation
- Expanding access to land banks
- Improving data collection and access
The staff report was meant to complement a national housing report issued by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System in January 2012.
The state has two major handicaps, according to the report. One, decades of population loss and economic stagnation has led to an oversupply of housing, much of it vacant and abandoned. Second, “spillover effects from a foreclosure rate that was elevated long before the recent recession. Together, these developments make Ohio a special case that does not fit neatly into the more familiar boom-bust narrative observed on a national scale.”
“It takes a long time--an average of one to two years--for mortgage loans to go from delinquency through the foreclosure process in Ohio,” the authors note. They point out that this can result in physical damage to abandoned properties, crime and push down prices in the surrounding neighborhoods. “Many states have moved to speed up the mortgage foreclosure process in cases where the owner has abandoned the home,” they add.
Another source of trouble is the Ohio law that requires minimum bids of at least two-thirds of foreclosed properties' appraised value at the first auction. Although this rule was meant to tamp down on speculation, it “may also price some well-meaning property rehabbers out of the market.” They suggest that “eliminating the minimum-bid requirements could also enhance market efficiency by lowering transaction costs and reducing the amount of time properties sit empty.”
There can be harmful speculation in these older cities if unscrupulous buyers purchase distressed properties without the intent of investing in them. Unfortunately, Ohio law helps such buyers in two ways. First, “the ability to become the new owner of property through a corporation without being registered to do business in Ohio, thus hampering the ability of code enforcement officials to pursue the owner for violations; and the ability to transfer the property without paying back taxes or correcting code violations.” They suggest that local governments could tackle the problem if buyers had to register with the Secretary of State and pay for back taxes or code violations.
However, even if these changes get done, another problem remains. “Understanding Ohio's housing markets is especially difficult because of the dearth of standardized, electronically stored data.” The state's counties store data in different ways, usually governed by “inertia and budget constraints. The payoff from a small investment in housing data standardization could be substantial.”
To view the online release, click here.
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.
Once you are an ALM Digital Member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking commercial real estate news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical coverage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
*May exclude premium content© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.