NEW YORK CITY-A recent survey of approximately 200 CRE executives ranked the criteria that most influences their selection of real estate service providers. Topping the list was “business savvy,” defined as the ability of a real estate services firm to understand the business drivers and challenges of its client companies and industries. What are those drivers? A clue can be found in what the Conference Board lists as the top challenges facing CEOs for 2013.

They are as follows: Human Capital; Operational Excellence; Innovation; Customer Relations; Global Political/Economic Risk; Government Regulation; Global Expansion; Corporate Brand and Reputation; Sustainability; and Trust in Business.

Decisions made around corporate real estate can significantly influence the majority of the above challenges. So, it's no wonder corporate real estate is seeking real estate strategies that go beyond just transactions from their providers.

In addition to business savvy, the survey, conducted by Watkins Research Group Inc. and Flaspöhler Research Group, also found the ability to deliver results as promised and within budget, and a willingness to adapt services to fit the client's corporate culture and needs among top selection criteria.

Accountability for results and budgets is reflected in the current trend towards corporate real estate teams becoming more centralized, with real estate being increasingly managed as a corporate financial asset. Scrutiny from the C-Suite and procurement departments alike is driving service provider selection criteria away from a focus on market expertise and toward priorities such as the ability to build lasting, strategic relationships with business units; assist with global data management to create intelligence on the real estate portfolio to drive strategic planning; and deliver consistent and measurable results.

At the same time that centralization is supporting control and consistency, corporate tenants are also demanding flexibility. While that may seem counterintuitive, it doesn't have to be. Governance programs, technology and good communications can provide a framework for global delivery. Empowered account teams who are trained to listen and adapt can be sensitive to client best practices, cultures, and needs. The right real estate provider should be both nimble enough to evolve alongside business priorities, and structured enough to ensure reliable results. And most importantly, the right provider should be fair and open about their pricing and scope of services, avoiding excessive “up-selling and extras” when the business demands a recalibration of services.

While market expertise and execution are still valuable traits, they are no longer exclusive criteria in the selection process. For any real estate professional whose livelihood depends on attracting and retaining corporate clients, it is important to understand both the changing priorities, and the service platform required to meet them. The more a provider can help clients and prospects align real estate objectives with their larger business imperatives, the more successful the relationship will be.

Mark Wanic is the America's Head of Occupier Services for Cushman & Wakefield's Corporate Occupier & Investor Services group. He is based in New York City. The views expressed in this column are the author's own.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Once you are an ALM Digital Member, you’ll receive:

  • Breaking commercial real estate news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
  • Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
  • Critical coverage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.