SAN FRANCISCO—After being sworn in to an unprecedented fourth term, California Governor Jerry Brown just recently revealed an ambitious new plan to address the impacts of climate change over the next 15 years. Among the Governor's bold climate initiatives is a plan to double the efficiency of California's existing buildings by 2030.
In climate change conversations, the energy, industrial and transportation sectors often garner most of the focus and attention because they collectively account for approximately eighty percent of the country's greenhouse gas emissions. But, commercial buildings also account for a significant percentage of emissions, a point not lost on California's Governor.
According to the United States Environmental Protection Agency's Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks (published in April 2014), approximately five percent of greenhouse gas emissions in the United States is generated by the operation of commercial buildings. This figure increases when emissions from electricity generation are included, given the significant electricity consumption by commercial buildings for lighting, heating, air conditioning, and operating appliances. The US Department of Energy estimates that commercial buildings on a national basis account for thirty five percent of domestic electricity consumption.
In California, the energy used in buildings accounts for the second largest contribution to the state's greenhouse gas emissions. In fact, when electricity-related greenhouse gas emissions are distributed across economic sectors, unlike its industrial sector counterpart, the commercial building sector has shown a marked increase in greenhouse gas emissions since 1990. Without significant changes in existing policy, the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) estimates that emissions from commercial buildings could grow at 1.8% per year over the next 15 years.
In addition to electricity consumption, commercial buildings generate greenhouse gas emissions through on-site fossil fuel combustion, waste management, and sub-optimal system performance. When combined with the reality that (1) the substantial majority of existing buildings in California and across the country will still be in use more than 50 years from now and (2) it is economically infeasible, and in many cases socially undesirable, to tear down California's existing commercial building stock and start from scratch, the task in reducing the state's carbon footprint and greenhouse gas emissions becomes even more daunting.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, even small efficiency upgrades can produce meaningful reductions in harmful emissions when measured over the life of an existing building. While the specifics of the Governor's most recent proposal have yet to be released, California does have some experience with establishing policy for energy efficiency upgrades to existing buildings. Governor Brown previously issued 2012 Executive Order (B-18-12), and its associated Green Building Action Plan, directed state agencies and departments to take immediate steps to green the state's buildings, reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve energy efficiency. These
efforts may provide a framework for the anticipated 2015 legislative proposal mandating that the state double the energy efficiency of its existing building stock.
Specifically, the requirements of Executive Order (B-18-12) included reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and water use, and the incorporation of clean, on-site power generation, such as solar photovoltaic, solar thermal, and wind, and clean back-up power supplies to replace the dirtier diesel generators in use at many commercial sites today. In addition, the order set a target of zero net energy consumption for 50% of the square footage of existing state-owned buildings by 2025, and zero net energy consumption from all renovated state buildings after 2025.
What this all means for real estate developers, investors, operators and users remains to be seen. However, one thing is certain. While technology and innovation offer many potential solutions on how to quickly embrace energy efficiency on a broad scale, the Governor knows that policy (incentives and penalties) is what makes it actually happen. Stay tuned!
Kristina D. Lawson is a Land Use Partner at Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP, located in the San Francisco office and Michael C. Polentz is Co-Chair of the Real Estate & Land Use Practice Group at Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP, located in the Palo Alto office. The views expressed in this column are the author's own.
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.
Once you are an ALM Digital Member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking commercial real estate news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical coverage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
*May exclude premium content© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
