NEW YORK CITY—A new report by the NYU Furman Center calls into question the feasibility of affordable housing in low-rent neighborhoods—such as East New York in Brooklyn and the Jerome Avenue corridor in the Bronx—tied to upzonings across New York City's neighborhoods.
The report, Creating Affordable Housing Out of Thin Air: The Economics of Mandatory Inclusionary Zoning in New York City, finds that the city's low-rent neighborhoods may not have sufficient market strength to justify high-density mixed-income development without other forms of subsidy. On the bright side however, the research reveals that a mandatory inclusionary zoning policy in New York City has the potential to produce affordable units in neighborhoods that already command relatively high rents, such as Downtown Brooklyn.
“Given the high cost of construction of high-and mid-rise buildings in New York City, we found that in many neighborhoods, rezoning on its own cannot spur new residential development, let alone result in new affordable housing without subsidy,” declares Mark Willis, executive director of the NYU Furman Center. “In high-rent neighborhoods, there is real potential to require affordable units where the city adds zoning density.”
The study used financial modeling to replicate how a typical developer might determine the feasibility of developing in various NYC neighborhoods considering different scenarios of market rents, building types, and affordability requirements. The model also considers the impact of property tax exemption, like 421-a, a program set to expire in June.
In many of the city's neighborhoods, rents are likely insufficient to justify new mid- and high-rise construction, let alone cross-subsidize the creation of new affordable housing through upzoning. In high-rent markets, however, the analysis shows that additional density is valuable; and much more so when combined with the 421-a property tax exemption.
For example, for a high-rise building in a very high-rent neighborhood, the city could require that about 28% of any additional zoning density be affordable if the building is subject to full property taxes. This share increases to 61% with full property tax exemption. The amount of affordable housing that can be required where the city upzones will also vary widely based on building type, local market rents, and how much additional density the upzoning adds.
The report highlights many of the crucial policy choices and tradeoffs that designing a new mandatory program will require. It also points out that the economics of a mandatory inclusionary zoning policy will shift over time.
“Looming over all of this is the future of 421-a, which is set to expire in June,” notes Willis. “Property tax relief greatly affects the ability of additional density to support the development of affordable housing.”
“While inclusionary zoning is only a piece of the mayor's housing plan,” he notes, “it could be an important tool for preserving the diversity of New York City's neighborhoods.”
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.
Once you are an ALM Digital Member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking commercial real estate news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical coverage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
*May exclude premium content© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.