Payvand Abghari, an associate in the real estate and land use practice group at Manatt, Phelps & Phillips LLP

California's legislature previously passed an update to Civil Code Section 1938 which, effective as of July 1, 2013, required all commercial property leases to disclose whether or not a commercial premises has undergone an inspection by a Certified Access Specialist (CASp), and if so, whether the premises has been determined to meet all applicable construction-related accessibility standards under California law. In the exclusive commentary below, Payvand Abghari, an associate in the real estate and land use practice group at Manatt, Phelps & Phillips LLP, along with Michael C. Polentz, co-chair of the group, say that “owners and lessors of commercial properties are advised to take steps now.”

The views expressed in the commentary below are the author's own.

Following the amendment to Section 1938, compliance with the amendment was achieved by plugging boilerplate disclosure language into leasing agreements. Notwithstanding such practices, the anecdotal experience seemingly suggested that further steps needed to be taken to bolster the amount of information prospective tenants of commercial properties are provided concerning a premises' compliance or non-compliance, as the case may be, with such standards.

As such, on September 16, 2016, in what was labeled an “urgency statute”, Governor Jerry Brown signed into law Assembly Bill 2093. This bill amends Section 1938 to impose additional disclosure requirements on commercial property owners and lessors. Under the revised statute, a commercial lease entered into on or after January 1, 2017 must now disclose not only whether the premises has undergone a CASp inspection (and the results, if any), but also the following additional obligations:

• Although state law does not require a CASp inspection to be conducted before entering into a commercial lease, if a premises has undergone a CASp inspection and, to the best of the commercial property owner's or lessor's knowledge, there have been no modifications or alterations completed or commenced between the date of the inspection and the date of the lease that have impacted the premises' compliance with construction-related accessibility standards, then the prospective tenant must be provided with a copy of the CASp inspection report before the lease is executed. In addition, if the CASp inspection report concludes that the premises satisfies the applicable accessibility standards, then the owner or lessor must provide copies of (i) any current disability access inspection certificate issued in connection with the CASp inspection and (ii) any other inspection report(s), within 7 days of executing the lease.

• If a CASp inspection report is not provided to a prospective tenant at least 48 hours prior to the lease being executed, then the tenant has a right to rescind the lease, based on information \contained in any report, for a period of up to 72 hours after the lease is executed.

• The prospective tenant must agree, pursuant to the lease or a separate confidentiality agreement, to keep information contained in any CASp report confidential, except as may be necessary for the tenant or its agents to complete any repairs or correct violations that the tenant agrees to undertake.

• If the premises has not undergone a CASp inspection, or if there have been intervening modifications to the premises since the date of the CASp inspection that have adversely impacted the premises' compliance with accessibility standards, then the lease must contain the following specific disclosure:

“A Certified Access Specialist (CASp) can inspect the subject premises and determine whether the subject premises comply with all of the applicable construction-related accessibility standards under state law. Although state law does not require a CASp inspection of the subject premises, the commercial property owner or lessor may not prohibit the lessee or tenant from obtaining a CASp inspection of the subject premises for the occupancy or potential occupancy of the lessee or tenant, if requested by the lessee or tenant. The parties shall mutually agree on the arrangements for the time and manner of the CASp inspection, the payment of the fee for the CASp inspection, and the cost of making any repairs necessary to correct violations of construction-related accessibility standards within the premises.”

• Any necessary repairs or modifications to bring the premises into compliance with construction-related accessibility standards that are disclosed by the CASp inspection report are presumed to be the responsibility of the property owner or lessor unless otherwise agreed to by the parties in the lease.

The intent of the legislature in enacting the new legislation is to increase the information flow to prospective tenants and to promote an active dialogue on the proactive steps that must be taken to attain compliance with current disability access laws. While the new law is likely to increase the number of inspections requested by prospective tenants in the coming year, thus potentially increasing the expense to owners and lessors to address necessary repairs, some may take comfort in the silver lining—the potential for a reduction in the risk of predatory litigation practices aimed at properties which fall short of existing, yet frequently updated, disability access laws.

To ensure that all commercial leases entered into on or after January 1, 2017 comply with the new law, owners and lessors of commercial properties are advised to take steps now to update their operational procedures so that prospective tenants are timely provided with CASp inspection reports and mitigate the risks of tenants rescinding their respective leases. Lease forms and rental agreements should also be reviewed and revised to ensure they contain the appropriate disclosures and otherwise comply with the new provisions of Section 1938.

Payvand Abghari, an associate in the real estate and land use practice group at Manatt, Phelps & Phillips LLP Manatt, Phelps & Phillips LLP

California's legislature previously passed an update to Civil Code Section 1938 which, effective as of July 1, 2013, required all commercial property leases to disclose whether or not a commercial premises has undergone an inspection by a Certified Access Specialist (CASp), and if so, whether the premises has been determined to meet all applicable construction-related accessibility standards under California law. In the exclusive commentary below, Payvand Abghari, an associate in the real estate and land use practice group at Manatt, Phelps & Phillips LLP, along with Michael C. Polentz, co-chair of the group, say that “owners and lessors of commercial properties are advised to take steps now.”

The views expressed in the commentary below are the author's own.

Following the amendment to Section 1938, compliance with the amendment was achieved by plugging boilerplate disclosure language into leasing agreements. Notwithstanding such practices, the anecdotal experience seemingly suggested that further steps needed to be taken to bolster the amount of information prospective tenants of commercial properties are provided concerning a premises' compliance or non-compliance, as the case may be, with such standards.

As such, on September 16, 2016, in what was labeled an “urgency statute”, Governor Jerry Brown signed into law Assembly Bill 2093. This bill amends Section 1938 to impose additional disclosure requirements on commercial property owners and lessors. Under the revised statute, a commercial lease entered into on or after January 1, 2017 must now disclose not only whether the premises has undergone a CASp inspection (and the results, if any), but also the following additional obligations:

• Although state law does not require a CASp inspection to be conducted before entering into a commercial lease, if a premises has undergone a CASp inspection and, to the best of the commercial property owner's or lessor's knowledge, there have been no modifications or alterations completed or commenced between the date of the inspection and the date of the lease that have impacted the premises' compliance with construction-related accessibility standards, then the prospective tenant must be provided with a copy of the CASp inspection report before the lease is executed. In addition, if the CASp inspection report concludes that the premises satisfies the applicable accessibility standards, then the owner or lessor must provide copies of (i) any current disability access inspection certificate issued in connection with the CASp inspection and (ii) any other inspection report(s), within 7 days of executing the lease.

• If a CASp inspection report is not provided to a prospective tenant at least 48 hours prior to the lease being executed, then the tenant has a right to rescind the lease, based on information \contained in any report, for a period of up to 72 hours after the lease is executed.

• The prospective tenant must agree, pursuant to the lease or a separate confidentiality agreement, to keep information contained in any CASp report confidential, except as may be necessary for the tenant or its agents to complete any repairs or correct violations that the tenant agrees to undertake.

• If the premises has not undergone a CASp inspection, or if there have been intervening modifications to the premises since the date of the CASp inspection that have adversely impacted the premises' compliance with accessibility standards, then the lease must contain the following specific disclosure:

“A Certified Access Specialist (CASp) can inspect the subject premises and determine whether the subject premises comply with all of the applicable construction-related accessibility standards under state law. Although state law does not require a CASp inspection of the subject premises, the commercial property owner or lessor may not prohibit the lessee or tenant from obtaining a CASp inspection of the subject premises for the occupancy or potential occupancy of the lessee or tenant, if requested by the lessee or tenant. The parties shall mutually agree on the arrangements for the time and manner of the CASp inspection, the payment of the fee for the CASp inspection, and the cost of making any repairs necessary to correct violations of construction-related accessibility standards within the premises.”

• Any necessary repairs or modifications to bring the premises into compliance with construction-related accessibility standards that are disclosed by the CASp inspection report are presumed to be the responsibility of the property owner or lessor unless otherwise agreed to by the parties in the lease.

The intent of the legislature in enacting the new legislation is to increase the information flow to prospective tenants and to promote an active dialogue on the proactive steps that must be taken to attain compliance with current disability access laws. While the new law is likely to increase the number of inspections requested by prospective tenants in the coming year, thus potentially increasing the expense to owners and lessors to address necessary repairs, some may take comfort in the silver lining—the potential for a reduction in the risk of predatory litigation practices aimed at properties which fall short of existing, yet frequently updated, disability access laws.

To ensure that all commercial leases entered into on or after January 1, 2017 comply with the new law, owners and lessors of commercial properties are advised to take steps now to update their operational procedures so that prospective tenants are timely provided with CASp inspection reports and mitigate the risks of tenants rescinding their respective leases. Lease forms and rental agreements should also be reviewed and revised to ensure they contain the appropriate disclosures and otherwise comply with the new provisions of Section 1938.

Continue Reading for Free

Register and gain access to:

  • Breaking commercial real estate news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
  • Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
  • Critical coverage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Natalie Dolce

Natalie Dolce, editor-in-chief of GlobeSt.com and GlobeSt. Real Estate Forum, is responsible for working with editorial staff, freelancers and senior management to help plan the overarching vision that encompasses GlobeSt.com, including short-term and long-term goals for the website, how content integrates through the company’s other product lines and the overall quality of content. Previously she served as national executive editor and editor of the West Coast region for GlobeSt.com and Real Estate Forum, and was responsible for coverage of news and information pertaining to that vital real estate region. Prior to moving out to the Southern California office, she was Northeast bureau chief, covering New York City for GlobeSt.com. Her background includes a stint at InStyle Magazine, and as managing editor with New York Press, an alternative weekly New York City paper. In her career, she has also covered a variety of beats for M magazine, Arthur Frommer's Budget Travel, FashionLedge.com, and Co-Ed magazine. Dolce has also freelanced for a number of publications, including MSNBC.com and Museums New York magazine.

nataliedolce

Just another ALM site