LONDON—With investors becoming more vocal about alternatives to the blind pool model, more private equity real estate funds are offering co-investment opportunities, Preqin said Wednesday. A recent Preqin survey of fund manager and investor attitudes to co-investments found that more than two-thirds of all real estate firms offered co-investments in 2016, up markedly from the year prior, while nearly half of managers will look to offer more co-investment opportunities this year.
“Private equity real estate fund managers are clearly seeing the benefits of offering co-investments, such as improved investor relationships and increased chances of a successful fundraise,” says Andrew Moylan, head of real estate products at Preqin. “Consequently, the proportion of funds that give investors these opportunities continues to rise. At a time of intense fundraising competition, with investors increasingly choosing to allocate large sums of capital to fewer fund managers, co-investment opportunities provide a perfect tool to attract investors and foster strong, sustainable and mutually beneficial relationships.” Investors surveyed by Preqin also like the sense of control over the direction of their capital that co-investments can provide, along with better returns and reduced fees.
However, Preqin notes that the greater control that accrues to investors via co-investment deals also creates hurdles for fund managers. The Preqin survey found the challenges associated with managing a deal with multiple investors that may have different decision-making timelines or different co-investment terms, as well as the reduction in control over a particular investment, represent the biggest headaches for the funds. “The additional cost of reporting and structuring these co-investments is also a potential negative for many firms,” according to Preqin.
Although many private RE funds offer co-investments only to a small sub-set of limited partners, Preqin's survey found that one-third offer them to more than one-fifth of their investors, and a “not insignificant” 13% of fund managers offered co-investment deals to all their investors last year. Generally speaking, though, relatively few investors took the funds up on these opportunities.
Thirty-nine percent of the 180 fund managers surveyed globally reported that none of their investors ended up making a co-investment when one was offered to them. A further 21% reported that only 10% or less of the investors that were offered a co-investment chose to invest.
LONDON—With investors becoming more vocal about alternatives to the blind pool model, more private equity real estate funds are offering co-investment opportunities, Preqin said Wednesday. A recent Preqin survey of fund manager and investor attitudes to co-investments found that more than two-thirds of all real estate firms offered co-investments in 2016, up markedly from the year prior, while nearly half of managers will look to offer more co-investment opportunities this year.
“Private equity real estate fund managers are clearly seeing the benefits of offering co-investments, such as improved investor relationships and increased chances of a successful fundraise,” says Andrew Moylan, head of real estate products at Preqin. “Consequently, the proportion of funds that give investors these opportunities continues to rise. At a time of intense fundraising competition, with investors increasingly choosing to allocate large sums of capital to fewer fund managers, co-investment opportunities provide a perfect tool to attract investors and foster strong, sustainable and mutually beneficial relationships.” Investors surveyed by Preqin also like the sense of control over the direction of their capital that co-investments can provide, along with better returns and reduced fees.
However, Preqin notes that the greater control that accrues to investors via co-investment deals also creates hurdles for fund managers. The Preqin survey found the challenges associated with managing a deal with multiple investors that may have different decision-making timelines or different co-investment terms, as well as the reduction in control over a particular investment, represent the biggest headaches for the funds. “The additional cost of reporting and structuring these co-investments is also a potential negative for many firms,” according to Preqin.
Although many private RE funds offer co-investments only to a small sub-set of limited partners, Preqin's survey found that one-third offer them to more than one-fifth of their investors, and a “not insignificant” 13% of fund managers offered co-investment deals to all their investors last year. Generally speaking, though, relatively few investors took the funds up on these opportunities.
Thirty-nine percent of the 180 fund managers surveyed globally reported that none of their investors ended up making a co-investment when one was offered to them. A further 21% reported that only 10% or less of the investors that were offered a co-investment chose to invest.
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.
Once you are an ALM Digital Member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking commercial real estate news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical coverage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
*May exclude premium content© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.