Photo of Michael McRoberts

MADISON, NJ—Three possible pathways to GSE reform, each with a few twists and turns not shared by the other two. In weighing the merits of these plans, Congress needs to consider the potential impact on access to capital and market dynamics, particularly in multifamily, write Hal Collett and Mike McRoberts at PGIM Real Estate Finance.

The Milken Institute, the Mortgage Bankers Association and the Urban Institute each have put forth proposals for reforming housing finance. Under the Milken scenario, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac would be reconstituted as lender-owned mutual funds, while Ginnie Mae would become a standalone government corporation that handled secondary market securitization functions.

Along with opening up the possibility of multiple guarantors, MBA's plan would replace Fannie and Freddie with privately owned independent utilities. It would also impose a regulatory structure for the Federal Housing Finance Agency to determine rates of return.

Continue Reading for Free

Register and gain access to:

  • Breaking commercial real estate news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
  • Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
  • Critical coverage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Paul Bubny

Paul Bubny is managing editor of Real Estate Forum and GlobeSt.com. He has been reporting on business since 1988 and on commercial real estate since 2007. He is based at ALM Real Estate Media Group's offices in New York City.