Davenport: In this case, Pacific Industrial is an industrial developer that has developed all types of product, but at the end of the day, it is traditionally known as a group that buys land and ultimately redevelops it. The fact that there are leases in place—four different tenants, each with different term—was of consideration but not necessarily a concern. Pacific Industrial's stance is that the site is probably the best land site in all of the county that's left because it sits down effectively between five major freeways. The firm is thinking that there may be leases in place, but depending upon who comes to the table in the next couple of years, that will affect how it develops the site, whether it's retail, mixed-use, last-mile distribution, etc. There are a lot of different ways the site could go. It took time to get city approval, and while it was a nuance, it didn't really affect the value or development opportunities associated with this site.

GlobeSt.com: How can real estate professionals find development opportunities in expiring master leases?

Davenport: Most developers are going to have a level of concern because they ultimately want to build buildings. So, when considering a site, if it has a long-term lease in place, it's not necessarily a good thing. Here, while there were positives like cash flow for developers, they also had termination rights. They could collect cash long term from the tenants, but if they decided to develop, they could execute termination rights with those tenants. In the future, it would be challenging to sell a site like this with a long-term lease in place because there's no finite period where they would actually be able to develop on it. Most of these developers come in, buy and immediately want to start development so that they're minimizing their risk from a market cycle perspective. But, if it's a great site with a tenant on it, if another tenant comes along that requires development, they could consider it at that point in time.

GlobeSt.com: What are some of the pitfalls to avoid in this process?

Davenport: Without any termination rights, it's about what the cash flow on the property is. The biggest risk would be if the site was not providing attractive returns as it sat. Pacific Industrial's case is different: if they did nothing, they still had an acceptable return. If they develop, it could be a home run, but if not, they're still sitting on a pretty attractive return. One pitfall to avoid would be buying a site encumbered by a long-term lease that's not providing an attractive return. Then, you're stuck in site that you won't be able to develop.

GlobeSt.com: What else should our readers know about your recent Platinum Triangle land transaction?

Davenport: This is a unique site. There are thousands of homes being developed around it. The transaction itself was very fast—it was a 30-day deal. Pacific Industrial moved very quickly through the process.