NEW YORK–Class A malls are in trouble. This is, at least, according to various analysts that expressed dismay last week about Brookfield Property Partners' $9.25 billion deal to acquire the rest of GGP. And of course, the market signaled its disapproval of the deal, promptly punishing retail REIT stocks in the wake of the news of the $23.50 per share purchase price. The theory behind the upset is that it had been broadly expected that GGP would trade at a higher price. The fact that it didn't — assuming shareholders approve the deal — thus points to a decline in valuations across all mall stocks, including the REITs that hold high-quality assets.
JPMorgan analysts said in a note that:
While we still see value in mall stocks, we think the GGP news is negative for the sector and, as such, we are moving our three previously overweight-rated mall REITs to neutral.
RBC Capital Markets analysts wrote that:
The terms of the agreement are below our target price [of $24 a share] and the average sell-side target, which suggests to us a reset lower for pricing of high-quality mall portfolios
And at BTIG:
GGP management has clearly stated on numerous occasions to shareholders that its assets are worth substantially more than where its shares are currently trading. We are surprised that the Special Committee has unanimously approved the new offer and recommends that the GGP shareholders approve the proposed terms.
These reports belie a year over year increase in inline store sales for such REITs as Macerich, Simon Property Group, Taubman and GGP, according to Trepp Talk.
Jen Loukedis breaks down the numbers in a post: Macerich reported that inline store sales across all of its properties climbed 4.8% to $660 per square foot last year. Simon reported average sales of $628 per square foot for 2017, a 2.3% increase from the previous year. Taubman's inline sales rose 2.3% to $810 per square foot while GGP's sales per square foot rose 10 basis points. “Even though occupancy declined for most of the country's top mall operators, all four of the aforementioned REITs managed to maintain levels north of 95%,” Loukedis wrote.
The reason why sales rose is simple: these REITs all have high-end tenant rosters.
The reason why the market punished the sector for GGP's disappointing acquisition price is less clear. Indisputably, REITs have been beaten down by the market over the last year in general; so has retail. For some time the market had been making a distinction between high-end retail REITs and those that held class B and C properties. Now it appears the line is blurring.
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.
Once you are an ALM Digital Member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking commercial real estate news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical coverage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
*May exclude premium content© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Erika Morphy
Erika Morphy has been writing about commercial real estate at GlobeSt.com for more than ten years, covering the capital markets, the Mid-Atlantic region and national topics. She's a nerd so favorite examples of the former include accounting standards, Basel III and what Congress is brewing.
