Nash says AB 2343 extends response periods to exclude weekends and other observed holidays.
SAN FRANCISCO—Assembly Bill 2343 is a new California law that gives tenants more time to respond to notices and summons in connection with unlawful detainer eviction proceedings. In this exclusive, Paul Nash, an attorney in the San Francisco office of Allen Matkins, outlines some of the specifics about the law.
GlobeSt.com: What is the current law regarding unlawful detainer actions?
Nash: The current law states that a tenant has three calendar days following the receipt of a notice from their landlord to fix a lease violation. This could include paying overdue rent or correcting any other breach of the lease. If the tenant does not remedy the violation within these three days, he or she must vacate the leased premises. The tenant also has five calendar days following a service of summons to respond to an eviction lawsuit, i.e., an unlawful detainer action, filed by the landlord.
GlobeSt.com: How does Assembly Bill 2343 amend this statute?
Nash: Assembly Bill 2343 extends a tenant's three-day and five-day response periods in an unlawful detainer action to exclude Saturdays, Sundays and other judicially observed holidays. These holidays may be different from the holidays landlords are used to in leases, so landlords should be aware of this. For example, César Chávez Day on March 31 is a notable holiday observed by the state of California, but not typically recognized as a holiday in a lease.
Under the current statute, a tenant that receives a three-day notice to cure or vacate on the day before Thanksgiving would be required to respond by Monday. Now that the governor has signed Assembly Bill 2343 into law, the amended statute would give the tenant until Wednesday to respond. This statute becomes effective September 1, 2019.
GlobeSt.com: How does this affect landlords?
Nash: Landlords should be aware of the new extended time periods when contemplating an unlawful detainer action. Landlords and tenants are free to modify these required time periods when entering into leases and other contracts.
GlobeSt.com: Are there any exceptions to this new law?
Nash: If a landlord and tenant agree to a lease that offers the tenant with a longer response time than is required under the revised statute, for example, 10 calendar days, then the tenant is able to follow the longer response time in the lease. In contrast, if the lease provides the tenant with a shorter response time than the statute requires, for example, three calendar days, the tenant is able to follow the longer response time specified by the revised statute and can ignore the term specified in the lease.
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.
Once you are an ALM Digital Member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking commercial real estate news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical coverage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
*May exclude premium content© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Lisa Brown
Lisa Brown is an editor for the south and west regions of GlobeSt.com. She has 25-plus years of real estate experience, with a regional PR role at Grubb & Ellis and a national communications position at MMI. Brown also spent 10 years as executive director at NAIOP San Francisco Bay Area chapter, where she led the organization to achieving its first national award honors and recognition on Capitol Hill. She has written extensively on commercial real estate topics and edited numerous pieces on the subject.
