Toby Scrivner, senior director of Stan Johnson Co.
When would it make sense to sell a portfolio versus single-asset? We chatted with Toby Scrivner, senior director of Stan Johnson Co., on the subject and so much more in this exclusive Q&A on the subject of net lease.
➤➤ Join the 17th Annual GlobeSt Net Lease Conference (formerly a RealShare event) on April 3 & 4 in NYC alongside the industry's most influential and knowledgeable real estate executives from the net lease sector. Click here to register and view the agenda.
GlobeSt.com: How does pricing differ when comparing portfolios versus single-asset transactions for the same tenant?
Toby Scrivner: In our experience, we routinely find that buyers expect a discount when acquiring portfolios of net lease assets versus their single-asset counterparts. Until recently though, we hadn't really analyzed the data to quantify this perception or theory of a “portfolio premium” – premium meaning that investors will pay a lower cap rate when the transaction size is larger. But many factors can influence an investment property's cap rate – credit of the tenant, age of the property, remaining lease term – and since not all portfolios are created equal, we see them trade at different cap rates. Therefore, the only way to measure the theory of the “portfolio premium” was to compare sales data for the most commonly transacted tenant/property – and the data actually refutes the theory! Of the 13 often-traded retail tenants we recently evaluated, all but one reported a negative variance in single-asset versus portfolio prices, meaning buyers are regularly paying higher average cap rates when buying in bulk.
When would it make sense to sell as a portfolio?
Scrivner: It depends on the seller's motivation. If maximum pricing isn't the top priority, a portfolio sale could make the most sense. For example, a seller might be more interested in minimizing the time required to execute a transaction. Time is a valuable and frequently expensive resource and selling as a portfolio to a single buyer can really expediate the process.
Is the same buyer pool going to be interested in both portfolio and single-asset sales?
Scrivner: There are definitely buyers who have an interest in both portfolios and single-assets when a specific tenant or credit is involved. That being said, there are buyers that require a certain deal size or dollar amount before they can justify spending necessary time to underwrite the investment. The buyer pool for large portfolios tend to be comprised of more sophisticated, experienced buyers, and as a general rule, the larger the transaction size, the smaller the pool of buyers.
What advice do you have for sellers in today's market?
Scrivner: Returning to our analysis, there are likely numerous factors involved in these reported sales that could have impacted the cap rates positively or negatively. But if a consistently higher cap rate can be measured on portfolio sales with similar asset characteristics (credit, real estate quality, lease terms, etc.), how much bigger would the spread be for diverse portfolios, when individual properties are specifically marketed and sold to a targeted, vastly bigger buyer pool? If the goal is to maximize your return on investment when selling a net lease property, the evidence indicates that individual asset sales are the best way to achieve this goal.
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.
Once you are an ALM Digital Member, you’ll receive:
- Breaking commercial real estate news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical coverage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
*May exclude premium content© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Natalie Dolce
Natalie Dolce, editor-in-chief of GlobeSt.com, is responsible for working with editorial staff, freelancers and senior management to help plan the overarching vision that encompasses GlobeSt.com, including short-term and long-term goals for the website, how content integrates through the company’s other product lines and the overall quality of content. Previously she served as national executive editor and editor of the West Coast region for GlobeSt.com and Real Estate Forum, and was responsible for coverage of news and information pertaining to that vital real estate region. Prior to moving out to the Southern California office, she was Northeast bureau chief, covering New York City for GlobeSt.com. Her background includes a stint at InStyle Magazine, and as managing editor with New York Press, an alternative weekly New York City paper. In her career, she has also covered a variety of beats for M magazine, Arthur Frommer's Budget Travel, FashionLedge.com, and Co-Ed magazine. Dolce has also freelanced for a number of publications, including MSNBC.com and Museums New York magazine.
