Photo by Shutterstock

Here's a question for you: If you could develop a project to a 5.75% yield on cost, would you do it at 5.825% if it were in an opportunity zone?

One investor's opinion is yes, but you'd probably be squinting. "It would be okay depending on who the investor was, what they wanted to do, but you ought not be doing a deal just because it's an opportunity zone deal," according to Paul Hughson, executive managing director at C-III Capital Partners. "It just has to make sense."

Hughson made his comments at a recent symposium held by Transwestern and GlobeSt. Real Estate Forum in New York City. Other participants included top level executives from BentallGreenOak, AXA Equitable Life and Clarion Partners.

Now that the final regulations for opportunity zones have been put in place by the Treasury Department, investors have a clearer idea of what the related costs and returns will be. Interest in these projects remain high, albeit perhaps more muted than when the opportunity zones were first revealed two years ago. The difference between then and now, however, is that more investors have the necessary data to see if the projects will pencil.

Brian Watkins, managing director and head of acquisitions for Clarion Partners, told the audience that the company has raised about $200 million for two series of opportunity zone funds, which it will start investing.

"I completely agree that the deal has to make sense in and of itself aside from the opportunity zone setting," he said. "We're seeing a lot of the land that is part of an opportunity zone has been priced to reflect the fact that you're getting the economic benefits of the opportunity zone. A lot of the deals that we're looking at don't make sense from an acquisition standpoint relative to the price it deserves to get."

In other words, he said, some of that benefit that you receive later via taxes is being offset by the increased price of the land on many of these deals. "We're seeing that as being a challenge on some of the sites that we're looking at."

Deals are getting done, these issues aside. Hughson told of an office building transaction it closed in November 2019 for its second value-add fund. "We're selling it as fully entitled to an opportunity zone fund," he said. "We're not doing it ourselves. We'll sell it to the fund because they'll pay up a little."

Odds are more transactions are coming now that the regs are in place—although they might not happen immediately.

When legislation was being drafted, nobody really understood what it was and we needed to be careful about coming out with a product that wasn't ready for whatever the regulations would ultimately call for, Watkins said. "But we did see a ton of demand and interest from our clients, as well as high net worth individuals reaching out.

"So we raised a lot of money, but we want to be judicious in how we're investing that. And if it means that we can't find the right deals until later, we'll make that happen later."

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Once you are an ALM Digital Member, you’ll receive:

  • Breaking commercial real estate news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
  • Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
  • Critical coverage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Erika Morphy

Erika Morphy has been writing about commercial real estate at GlobeSt.com for more than ten years, covering the capital markets, the Mid-Atlantic region and national topics. She's a nerd so favorite examples of the former include accounting standards, Basel III and what Congress is brewing.