Landlords Ponder Whether to Cave to WeWork's Demands for Better Lease Rates

Landlords won’t want to suddenly see a big tenant disappear, but at the same time they have reasons to be wary of large-scale accommodations.

Just last month, WeWork brought up a question of whether it could survive or if it might need to file for bankruptcy.

The company has been scrambling. It just completed the 1-for-40 reverse stock split it needed to remain listed on the NYSE exchange rather than falling into over-the-counter penny-stock trading. But that’s not enough. Now, in a public letter, CEO David Tolley said that it plans to negotiate heavily with landlords to get lease concessions.

And that presents a conundrum for those landlords, who face a difficult decision.

WeWork’s initial decision to present itself as a tech company, to bring in high-multiple technology type investment, started a trip down a road that led to where it is today. “The firm had scooped up long-term leases in prime office space around the world, expecting to make money by subletting the space on a short-term basis to firms and individuals looking for flexibility and trendy digs,” the BBC recently wrote

It didn’t work as planned and now Tolley is informing its landlords that its current lease liabilities – which were over two-thirds of total operating expenses in the second quarter – are too high and “dramatically out of step with current market conditions.

 “We are taking immediate action to permanently fix our inflexible and high-cost lease portfolio to achieve the sustainable operating model that we need to serve our members for many years to come.”

That means “a process of global engagement with our landlords to renegotiate nearly all our leases,” he wrote. 

Tolley added that the company intends to remain in the majority of its buildings and markets. 

In today’s market, this presents a number of conflicting problems for landlords:

The next few weeks are going to be interesting for the entire office market.